Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
[...]
I tend to prefer the "one patch for each dialog" approach, but I would
like to know your thoughts on this.
Here is the first one, dlgAggregate.xrc.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
Index: pgadmin/ui/dlgAggregate.xrc
===
Hello,
OpenSolaris has IPADDR_NONE defined in netinet/in.h. but Solaris 10 does
not.
I believe the previous builds for pgAdmin 1.8.4 for were only done for
OpenSolaris.
Could you please confirm, zdenek ?
Mayuresh
Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Mayuresh Nirhali
<[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Mayuresh Nirhali
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While building pgadmin 1.8.4 on Solaris 10, I encountered following error.
>
> "./debugger/dbgPgConn.cpp", line 97: Error: INADDR_NONE is not defined.
> gmake[2]: *** [dbgPgConn.o] Error 1
>
> This seems to be
Hello,
While building pgadmin 1.8.4 on Solaris 10, I encountered following error.
"./debugger/dbgPgConn.cpp", line 97: Error: INADDR_NONE is not defined.
gmake[2]: *** [dbgPgConn.o] Error 1
This seems to be a known problem with Solaris10.
I prepared a patch based on how the same issue is worked
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you also check on Windows. No issue found?
No, I don't have Windows to hand at the moment. I'm sure it will be
fine here though if it works OK for you. Windows is pretty predictable
in that way :-)
> I prefer
Dave Page a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The last patch I sent works on GTK+. When I try it on Windows, it works for
dlgFunction and dlgTrigger and doesn't with all other dlg*. I tried to
understand what could be wrong with dlgDatabase. dl
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last patch I sent works on GTK+. When I try it on Windows, it works for
> dlgFunction and dlgTrigger and doesn't with all other dlg*. I tried to
> understand what could be wrong with dlgDatabase. dlgFunction already
Dave Page a écrit :
(apologies for not reviewing the latest patch yet - we moved offices
on Monday so I've been tied up with that for the last few days)
No problem, don't worry :)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I worked on the remaining issue
(apologies for not reviewing the latest patch yet - we moved offices
on Monday so I've been tied up with that for the last few days)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I worked on the remaining issue tonight and it seems I can fix it this way:
> I add
