[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III: the debugger does not pre-populate default values for arguments

2011-02-07 Thread Nikhil S
Hi, The debugger, when it is invoked on a function or a procedure, provides a dialogue box to fill up values for the arguments. In case the user has created them with some default values assigned to some of the parameters, then they would expect that the debugger pre-populates them with those defa

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Hiding Schedules/Step tabs while creating a new pgAgent job

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Nikhil S wrote: >> >> >> > When creating a new job, if one directly clicks on the Schedules tab and >> > tries to add one, then the date picker does not work. I was trying to >> > see >> > why this is so for quite a while. Then I realized that adding a schedule >> >

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Additional cleanup of the build system as discussed

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Page
Additional cleanup of the build system as discussed at FOSDEM: - Move optimisation levels from CPPFLAGS into CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS - Remove the --no-precomp option from the Mac build options - Remove some bogus code that cleared(!) CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS Branch -- master Details --- http://git.pos

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database

2011-02-07 Thread Nikhil S
Hi, If one clicks on Postgres (non EDB) database and tries to expand the schema tab, then the current git head spits out an error. The offending query contains the following comparison protype = 1; protype is of type char, so it expects the RHS to be a char. However this works ok against an EDB

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: make style

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Page
make style Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=638b543f59b4ff6962957a2b21e9d625f85aba90 Modified Files -- pgadmin/dlg/dlgSynonym.cpp |4 ++-- pgadmin/frm/events.cpp |2 +- pgadmin/include/ct

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] phase 2 of wxWidgets 2.9 build

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Geoghegan
I'm not sure how to deal with the apparent removal of the wxRESIZE_BOX and wxTHICK_FRAME style flags. The removal of wxRESIZE_BOX is documented here: http://trac.wxwidgets.org/ticket/9735 . Does anyone have any particular feelings on what should be done, other than "suck it and see"? -- Regards

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] phase 2 of wxWidgets 2.9 build

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I'm not sure how to deal with the apparent removal of the wxRESIZE_BOX > and wxTHICK_FRAME style flags. > > The removal of wxRESIZE_BOX is documented here: > http://trac.wxwidgets.org/ticket/9735 . > > Does anyone have any particular feeling

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Update russian translation.

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Update russian translation. Branch -- REL-1_12_0_PATCHES Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=7da37710574ed43025dc1217ce72e9b30646ef4d Author: Timon Modified Files -- i18n/ru_RU/pgadmin3.mo | Bin 238615 -> 241052 bytes i18n/ru_RU/pgadmi

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] phase 2 of wxWidgets 2.9 build

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Geoghegan
I've fixed the SQL editor segfault - it was a wild pointer dereference. I don't currently know what condition has changed in the 2.9 to make both gqbSplitter::tablesBrowser gqbSplitter::browserPanel not initialised to something valid when onVerticalSashResize() is called, so now we just check if th

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Russian translate fixes

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 03/02/2011 14:14, Timon a écrit : > Some changes. > You can merge directly from git repo > https://github.com/Timosha/pgadmin3/commits/ru_translate > Commited. Thanks. BTW, don't send patch for .po files. That simply doesn't work. Send the whole .po file. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresq

[pgadmin-hackers] Support for SQL/MED Foreign Data Wrapper object

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Hi, Simple patch to add FDW object support. A new icon would be great. Comments? -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com From 3bb0af0dc1c26489b723a268eedd722a6a06683f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillaume Lelarge Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 11:59:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Suppo

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feature: visual feedback of disabled triggers

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 04/02/2011 11:42, R.I.K a écrit : > [...] > I would like to suggest you a simple feature : is it possible to add, in > the left panel of pgAdmin (objects browser), a visual feedback of > disabled triggers (like a red cross, for example, or a greyed icon) ? > I think the greyed icon would be be

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 07/02/2011 13:01, Nikhil S a écrit : > Hi, > > If one clicks on Postgres (non EDB) database and tries to expand the schema > tab, then the current git head spits out an error. The offending query > contains the following comparison > > protype = 1; > > protype is of type char, so it expects t

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III: the debugger does not pre-populate default values for arguments

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 07/02/2011 09:03, Nikhil S a écrit : > [...] > The debugger, when it is invoked on a function or a procedure, provides a > dialogue box to fill up values for the arguments. In case the user has > created them with some default values assigned to some of the parameters, > then they would expect t

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feature: visual feedback of disabled triggers

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Le 04/02/2011 11:42, R.I.K a écrit : >> [...] >> I would like to suggest you a simple feature : is it possible to add, in >> the left panel of pgAdmin (objects browser), a visual feedback of >> disabled triggers (like a red cross, for exam

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database

2011-02-07 Thread Nikhil S
> I"m not sure I understand. You first said that the bug is on regular > PostgreSQL (and I can't reproduce it on 9.0 regular PostgreSQL). When > you explain the bug and if I read correctly your patch, it fixes EDB > database only. > > So is it a fix for EDB databases or PostgreSQL databases? > > We

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database

2011-02-07 Thread Nikhil S
> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for > me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS specific. > > Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number and also for a bool which is set to true in EDBAS mode. So yeah, this