Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [PATCH] Beautify line-ends handling yet more.

2015-10-10 Thread Szabolcs Hubai
As an alternative solution you could do it as Notepad++ does: Unix/Mac, DOS/Windows, old Mac. 2015-10-10 15:51 GMT+02:00 Dave Page : > > >> On 10 Oct 2015, at 13:33, Nikolai Zhubr wrote: >> >> Hello Dave, >> 09.10.2015 16:31, Dave Page wrote: >> [...] >>> I committed a modified version of this -

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [PATCH] Beautify line-ends handling yet more.

2015-10-10 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
Hello Dave, 10.10.2015 16:51, Dave Page wrote: [...] * Unix/Mac (LF) * DOS/Windows (CRLF) If it is OK then I'll craft a git diff for that (eventually). I'm not sure we should - it may be useful for someone working with legacy systems, and it's not like it's a massive amount of code bloating t

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [PATCH] Beautify line-ends handling yet more.

2015-10-10 Thread Dave Page
> On 10 Oct 2015, at 13:33, Nikolai Zhubr wrote: > > Hello Dave, > 09.10.2015 16:31, Dave Page wrote: > [...] >> I committed a modified version of this - Mac OS X uses \n as a >> line-end, so that makes a better default than the old-style \r used on >> Mac classic. > > Ah, I didn't know that,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [PATCH] Beautify line-ends handling yet more.

2015-10-10 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
Hello Dave, 09.10.2015 16:31, Dave Page wrote: [...] I committed a modified version of this - Mac OS X uses \n as a line-end, so that makes a better default than the old-style \r used on Mac classic. Ah, I didn't know that, thanks for explanation. I suppose it is unlikely someone will use curr