> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 December 2004 12:27
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to
Dave Page wrote:
I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in
src, slack and win formats.
Ah, there it is our new baby, thanks to all contributors, packagers,
translators, friends!
Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new
code committed :-)
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:51:59 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Uploaded the new RPM for FC3 and SRPM to developer site. Could you please
> take a look at them?
Both the src and i686 RPMs look fine, including the signatures:
As root, I imported your public key into the RPM database:
rpm --import dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Troels Arvin wrote:
It's very hard for me -- the servers and users that I build RPMs and use
gpg are different...
GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm
parameter.
Ok, seems what I've missed before.
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:56:05 +, Dave Page wrote:
> Besides, unless I produce them, I'm not signing them anyway
OK. That's a fair policy.
>> Now, it would be nice
>> if the http://www.pgadmin.org/ front page had the news, too.
>
> Working on it...
Oh, yes. I can see that. Nice.
--
Greet
Message d'origine
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>De: Troels Arvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:44:31 +0100
>
>On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote:
>
>> GPG signatures
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Troels Arvin
> Sent: 01 December 2004 10:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Tro
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote:
> GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm
> parameter.
By the way: It would be nice if Dave's signature were used, as is the case
for the source tar-balls. Dave: Do you have RPM on your system? - Could
you add s
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:45:08 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> It's very hard for me -- the servers and users that I build RPMs and use
> gpg are different...
GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm
parameter.
--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Troels Arvin wrote:
RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM have been been built.
How about gpg-signing the RPMs?
It's very hard for me -- the servers and users that I build RPMs and use
gpg are different...
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Barwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 November 2004 12:16
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>
> Thought you might say that ;-).
Yup, well, if I don't ask, I
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:32:09 -, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ian Barwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 29 November 2004 22:24
(...)
> > I don't suppose there's anyone maintaining RPMs for recent
> > SUSE versions?
>
> Not that I'm aware
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Barwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 November 2004 22:24
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:23:49 -, Dave Page
> <[EMA
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 November 2004 23:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> it see
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 November 2004 22:03
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:02:42 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM have been been built.
How about gpg-signing the RPMs?
--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
---(end of broadcast)--
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:23:49 -, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in
> src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure
> they look OK before we announce.
Built fine on SUSE 9.1 and works without
h may enter in Debian/unstable and maybe then
Debian/testing...
So, you'll have to wait a little bit until I release 1.2.0 packages.
Cheers,
Raphaël
Message d'origine----
>Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
>Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:57:59 -
>De: "Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Page wrote:
I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in
src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure
they look OK before we announce.
RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM h
Dave:
src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests like connecting, retrieving and updating data passed OK.
Diego.
El lun, 29-11-2004 a las 21:23 +, Dave Page escribió:
I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/
Thanks Diego :-)
/D
From: Diego Gil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 21:48To: Dave PageCc:
PgAdmin HackersSubject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold
uploaded
Dave:src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my
Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests
I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in
src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure
they look OK before we announce.
On a related note, has anyone started work on a release announcement
yet? If not, I'll write one up tomorrow.
Finally,
22 matches
Mail list logo
