Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Date representation

2002-04-11 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 April 2002 15:10 > To: noy > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Date representation > > > > CREATE TABLE "EMPLOYEE_SYSTEM" ( > >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Date representation

2002-04-11 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
> CREATE TABLE "EMPLOYEE_SYSTEM" ( > "EMP_ID" integer, > "EMP_EMAIL" character varying(80), > "EMP_TIMESTAMP" timestamp with time zone, > ); Your schema is correct (timestamp with time zone = timestamptz). > > By the way, did you upgrade pgAdmin2 and odbc driver to the la

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Date representation

2002-04-11 Thread noy
Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > > M$ Access2K relies on timestamps to update fields and 7.3 replaces timestamp > -> timestamptz. Are there any timestamp in your table or only dates? Maybe > you could copy table definition in your mail? Here is an example of the table definition. I use the timestamptz

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Date representation

2002-04-11 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Jeudi 11 Avril 2002 13:19, noy a écrit : > Then when I am trying to update this field from ACCESS I have an error and > the entry can't be updated because the dates are not equals. Dear Noy, M$ Access2K relies on timestamps to update fields and 7.3 replaces timestamp -> timestamptz. Are ther

[pgadmin-hackers] Date representation

2002-04-11 Thread noy
Hi, I having some problem with the date fields migration from 7.1.3 version to 7.2 version... In my current version PostgreSQL 7.1.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96 I get this result select now(); now 2002-04-11 12:58:33+02 (1 row) In