On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 21:12 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
> > I tried something else today. Suppose a database with two schemas. Both
> > have objects in them, let's say two tables in each schema. Connect to
> > the database, click on the + o
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> I tried something else today. Suppose a database with two schemas. Both
> have objects in them, let's say two tables in each schema. Connect to
> the database, click on the + of the first schema. You'll see all objects
> in it. Now, resta
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:56 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:53 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Did some tests and found something weird. I
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:53 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Did some tests and found something weird. I connect pgadmin to a
>> > database, I look into some objects with
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:53 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
> >
> > Did some tests and found something weird. I connect pgadmin to a
> > database, I look into some objects with pgAdmin's browser. Then, I stop
> > PostgreSQL, and start it again.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic
wrote:
> There are some unexpected errors, when reconnecting.
> 1. Open Function collection, shutdown DB, click on a function: Result:
> stacktrace.png
> 2. Open Table collection, shutdown DB, click on a table, start DB,
> reconnect: Result: stac
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
>
> Did some tests and found something weird. I connect pgadmin to a
> database, I look into some objects with pgAdmin's browser. Then, I stop
> PostgreSQL, and start it again. Next object I click on will display a
> nice "lost connection"
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:18 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> I've been sufficiently annoyed by Josh's discovery that the
> reconnection changes in 1.14 are still broken in some situations that
> I've spent most of the day hacking on this. It's become pretty clear
> to me that the current code structure re
I've been sufficiently annoyed by Josh's discovery that the
reconnection changes in 1.14 are still broken in some situations that
I've spent most of the day hacking on this. It's become pretty clear
to me that the current code structure really doesn't lend itself to
cleanly handling all possible di
