Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Missing RULEs from VIEWs and their format

2010-04-10 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 09/04/2010 15:03, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : > On 08.04.2010 22:38, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote: >> Le 07/04/2010 19:47, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : >> >>> [...] >>> I have just filed ticket #167 concerning missing RULEs with VIEWs. >>> On a related but less important note: the formatting

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Missing RULEs from VIEWs and their format

2010-04-09 Thread Erwin Brandstetter
On 08.04.2010 22:38, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote: Le 07/04/2010 19:47, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : [...] I have just filed ticket #167 concerning missing RULEs with VIEWs. On a related but less important note: the formatting of rules might be improved if was done like triggers are: -- sta

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Missing RULEs from VIEWs and their format

2010-04-08 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 07/04/2010 19:47, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : > [...] > I have just filed ticket #167 concerning missing RULEs with VIEWs. > On a related but less important note: the formatting of rules might be > improved if was done like triggers are: > > -- status quo > CREATE OR REPLACE RULE on_delete AS

[pgadmin-hackers] Missing RULEs from VIEWs and their format

2010-04-07 Thread Erwin Brandstetter
Hi developers! I have just filed ticket #167 concerning missing RULEs with VIEWs. On a related but less important note: the formatting of rules might be improved if was done like triggers are: -- status quo CREATE OR REPLACE RULE on_delete AS ON DELETE TO test DO INSTEAD DELETE FROM test2