Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch to add GIT support

2010-06-28 Thread Dave Page
OK, I applied the attached patch to TRUNK. I didn't bother with the back branches - they'll just show up with a revision number of 'Unknown' anyway, and it's not like we're going to release any more versions from them. On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > No objection from my en

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch to add GIT support

2010-06-27 Thread Ashesh Vashi
No objection from my end. :P Looks good to me. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise Postgres Company On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Dave Page wrote: > The attached patch to the build system adds the ability for version > stamping to

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch to add GIT support

2010-06-25 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 25/06/2010 18:36, Dave Page a écrit : > The attached patch to the build system adds the ability for version > stamping to happen either when working in an SVN repo or GIT repo. In > an SVN repo, it will stamp the repo version number, such as 2134:2137M > as the current code does. In a GIT repo,

[pgadmin-hackers] Patch to add GIT support

2010-06-25 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch to the build system adds the ability for version stamping to happen either when working in an SVN repo or GIT repo. In an SVN repo, it will stamp the repo version number, such as 2134:2137M as the current code does. In a GIT repo, it'll stamp the short version of the last commit