On 10 April 2011 21:58, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> FYI, I have four patches to push. I intended to do that tuesday evening,
> but I can do that on monday evening if you prefer. This way, you could
> work tuesday with almost all the code for 1.14.
Okay, let's do that.
--
Peter Geoghegan ht
Le 10/04/2011 22:58, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 10/04/2011 12:53, Peter Geoghegan a écrit :
>> I would like to have "experimental support for wxWidgets 2.9" as a
>> feature for this release - it might encourage some curious person to
>> build against 2.9. I'll make sure that support hasn't br
Le 10/04/2011 19:10, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Peter Geoghegan
> wrote:
>> I would like to have "experimental support for wxWidgets 2.9" as a
>> feature for this release - it might encourage some curious person to
>> build against 2.9. I'll make sure that support has
Le 10/04/2011 12:53, Peter Geoghegan a écrit :
> I would like to have "experimental support for wxWidgets 2.9" as a
> feature for this release - it might encourage some curious person to
> build against 2.9. I'll make sure that support hasn't broken tomorrow.
> It needs to be maintained going forwa
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I would like to have "experimental support for wxWidgets 2.9" as a
> feature for this release - it might encourage some curious person to
> build against 2.9. I'll make sure that support hasn't broken tomorrow.
> It needs to be maintained
I would like to have "experimental support for wxWidgets 2.9" as a
feature for this release - it might encourage some curious person to
build against 2.9. I'll make sure that support hasn't broken tomorrow.
It needs to be maintained going forward.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.c
Le 05/04/2011 10:24, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 04/04/2011 21:53, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> [...]
> The security label feature isn't hard to implement. I previously thought
> we would need to add yet another tab, which bores me to death, but I had
> another idea while working on the dialo
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> The security label feature isn't hard to implement. I previously thought
>> we would need to add yet another tab, which bores me to death, but I had
>> another idea while working
Hi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Hmm, nights help you remember some stuff. So, just to let you know the
> things we don't support yet:
>
> * 7.4: operator class (the properties dialog only)
>
> * 8.3: operator family (the properties dialog only)
We intentionally neve
Le 04/04/2011 21:53, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le 04/04/2011 16:59, Dave Page a écrit :
>> [...]
>> We need to start planning for 1.14 beta 1, to be released roughly in
>> line with PostgreSQL 9.1 beta 1 which is likely to be just a few short
>> weeks away.
>>
>> Does anyone have any o
Hi,
Le 04/04/2011 16:59, Dave Page a écrit :
> [...]
> We need to start planning for 1.14 beta 1, to be released roughly in
> line with PostgreSQL 9.1 beta 1 which is likely to be just a few short
> weeks away.
>
> Does anyone have any outstanding patches or WIP for this release?
>
Nope. I'm on
Hi,
We need to start planning for 1.14 beta 1, to be released roughly in
line with PostgreSQL 9.1 beta 1 which is likely to be just a few short
weeks away.
Does anyone have any outstanding patches or WIP for this release?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
Enterpr
12 matches
Mail list logo
