On 18 July 2011 22:25, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:15 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 18 July 2011 21:55, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:06 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> On 14 July 2011 10:31, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> > On 14 July 2011 10:24, Guilla
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:15 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 18 July 2011 21:55, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:06 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 14 July 2011 10:31, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> > On 14 July 2011 10:24, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >> >> So, you're working on fixin
On 18 July 2011 21:55, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:06 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 14 July 2011 10:31, Thom Brown wrote:
>> > On 14 July 2011 10:24, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> >> So, you're working on fixing it, right?
>> >
>> > Possibly ;) : http://code.pgadmin.org/t
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:06 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 14 July 2011 10:31, Thom Brown wrote:
> > On 14 July 2011 10:24, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >> So, you're working on fixing it, right?
> >
> > Possibly ;) : http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/329
> >
> > I haven't had time to look at fix
On 14 July 2011 10:31, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 14 July 2011 10:24, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> So, you're working on fixing it, right?
>
> Possibly ;) : http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/329
>
> I haven't had time to look at fixing various bugs over the last couple
> days but I'll get to them s
On 14 July 2011 10:24, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:17 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 12 July 2011 11:11, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:55 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> On 12 July 2011 10:53, Dave Page wrote:
>> >> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:17 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 12 July 2011 11:11, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:55 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 12 July 2011 10:53, Dave Page wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> >> Hi (yes, me... again),
> >
On 12 July 2011 11:11, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:55 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 12 July 2011 10:53, Dave Page wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> Hi (yes, me... again),
>> >>
>> >> Tiny patch attached to prevent adding attributes with
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:55 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 12 July 2011 10:53, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> Hi (yes, me... again),
> >>
> >> Tiny patch attached to prevent adding attributes with a duplicate name
> >> to a type. It seems previous vers
On 12 July 2011 10:53, Dave Page wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Hi (yes, me... again),
>>
>> Tiny patch attached to prevent adding attributes with a duplicate name
>> to a type. It seems previous versions prevented this, but must have
>> been allowed in a commit si
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> Hi (yes, me... again),
>
> Tiny patch attached to prevent adding attributes with a duplicate name
> to a type. It seems previous versions prevented this, but must have
> been allowed in a commit since the last release.
For consistency with the
Hi (yes, me... again),
Tiny patch attached to prevent adding attributes with a duplicate name
to a type. It seems previous versions prevented this, but must have
been allowed in a commit since the last release.
Regards
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux u
12 matches
Mail list logo
