Sorry - missed that. I generally prefer to only include SQL DDL for
things that are non-default.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Erwin Brandstetter
wrote:
> Hi Dave!
>
> I send a reply on the thread to you, Dave. Guillaume seems to like the idea
> somewhat. I wonder what you think about it.
>
>
>
Hi Dave!
I send a reply on the thread to you, Dave. Guillaume seems to like the
idea somewhat. I wonder what you think about it.
On 29.04.2010 17:50, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
On 29.04.2010 15:21, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Erwin Brandstetter
wrote:
>> Not right now. Dave is working on getting out beta 1 for pgAdmin 1.12. I
>> don't think he has the time to prepare a new 1.10 minor release, and I'm
>> not sure this is the perfect timing for it. But I hope we'll have one
>> before 1.1
On 30.04.2010 00:40, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 30/04/2010 00:35, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
On 29.04.2010 18:48, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29/04/2010 17:50, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
On 29.04.201
Le 30/04/2010 00:35, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
> On 29.04.2010 18:48, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
>> Le 29/04/2010 17:50, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>
>>> Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>>>
On 29.04.2010 15:21, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
>>> [.
On 29.04.2010 18:48, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Le 29/04/2010 17:50, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
On 29.04.2010 15:21, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
[...]
What do you think of it? Should I create a ticket?
Le 29/04/2010 17:50, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>> On 29.04.2010 15:21, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
> [...]
What do you think of it? Should I create a ticket?
>>> Well, I would like to have a better handling of the "SET STORAGE"
Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
> On 29.04.2010 15:21, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
>> Sorry for not answering sooner.
>>
>
> No problem, the thread is old, but I just posted that yesterday. :)
>
>
>> Le 29/04/2010 14:15, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>>
>>> On 28.04.201
On 29.04.2010 15:21, guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Sorry for not answering sooner.
No problem, the thread is old, but I just posted that yesterday. :)
Le 29/04/2010 14:15, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
On 28.04.2010 19:16, brandstet...@falter.at wrote:
Aloha!
I am testing Gui
Sorry for not answering sooner.
Le 29/04/2010 14:15, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
> On 28.04.2010 19:16, brandstet...@falter.at wrote:
>> Aloha!
>>
>> I am testing Guillaume's version of pgadmin3.exe from Apr. 17.
>>
>> The fix below is included and it seems to fix the problem just fine.
>> Howeve
On 28.04.2010 19:16, brandstet...@falter.at wrote:
Aloha!
I am testing Guillaume's version of pgadmin3.exe from Apr. 17.
The fix below is included and it seems to fix the problem just fine.
However, as a side effect (?) there is now a redundant statement for
each and every column:
ALTER
11 matches
Mail list logo