Certainly works for me, so something is wrong for you. Did you
rebuild? Could be a dependency miss o rsomething..
//magnus
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 21:25, Jasmin Dizdarevic
wrote:
> Hi,
> I thought it should be "Slony Replication" in the tree, but the latest
> master-build show's: "Replication"?
Hi,
I thought it should be "Slony Replication" in the tree, but the latest
master-build show's: "Replication"?
Am I doing wrong, or is this wanted?
2011/6/26 Magnus Hagander
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 19:52, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Fri,
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 19:52, Dave Page wrote:
> On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:10, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:41 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:10, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:41 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wro
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:10, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:41 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:41 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander
> >>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan
>> >> w
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Hi!
I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the S
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony
>>> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony
>> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep it.
>
> That was the deal. FWIW, I consider our Slo
On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony
> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep it.
That was the deal. FWIW, I consider our Slony support to be less than
useless, in that it is basically a GU
Hi!
I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony
support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep it. I
would, however, suggest that we rename it to actually be "slony
replication" rather than "replication". Or "Use slony" rather than
"Use replication". Calling it
13 matches
Mail list logo
