Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

- Original Message - From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification > Hiroshi Saito wrote: >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Hiroshi Saito wrote: Hi Andreas. From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dave Page wrote: What libpq should we be using now anyway? 7.4b1+SSL? 7.4b1 is fine for me. Is it to confirm FE/BE protocol No3? 7.4 complying with is seen here and there besides, too. You have been

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Hi Andreas. From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dave Page wrote: > > >What libpq should we be using now anyway? 7.4b1+SSL? > > > > > 7.4b1 is fine for me. Is it to confirm FE/BE protocol No3? 7.4 complying with is seen here and there besides, too. You have been already confident. Let

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Dave Page wrote: What libpq should we be using now anyway? 7.4b1+SSL? 7.4b1 is fine for me. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 20030819 is the date the tarball was updated by us. The README.pgAdmin > file within the tarball tells you the date that the CVS snapshot was > taken. Ah. It was impolite!! written to pgadmin.README I has sleepiness a little Regards, Hiroshi Saito --

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

> -Original Message- > From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 August 2003 13:29 > To: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification > > > Hi Dave. > > From: "Dave Page&

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Hi Dave. From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 August 2003 09:50 > To: Hiroshi Saito > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modificat

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 August 2003 09:50 > To: Hiroshi Saito > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification > > Dave, could you apply the appended patch to our 20

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Hiroshi Saito wrote: From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Hiroshi, (snip) [> Can't say anything about that, please continue using the frozen wxWindows-pgAdmin3-20030722 version. Any later version is unpredictable until we have a wx2.5 release. Regards, Andreas Ok. The prob

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Hiroshi, (snip) [> Can't say anything about that, please continue using the frozen > wxWindows-pgAdmin3-20030722 version. Any later version is unpredictable > until we have a wx2.5 release. > > Regards, > Andreas Ok. The problem that it was flown her

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Hi Hiroshi, Hiroshi Saito wrote: 1) pgobject.cpp(666) : error C2668: 'wxString::wxString' This happens with MSW. ' ' -> wxT(" ") change This fix is wrong, the current code is correct. The used constructor will create a string of indent spaces. 2) ui\frmmain.cpp(23) : fatal error wx/tbarsmpl.h.

[pgadmin-hackers] Small modification

Hi Andreas. 1) pgobject.cpp(666) : error C2668: 'wxString::wxString' This happens with MSW. ' ' -> wxT(" ") change 2) ui\frmmain.cpp(23) : fatal error wx/tbarsmpl.h... It seems that it was moved with recent wxWindows-cvs to contrib. had better take it. Even if it is not here, it is all right wit