-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2003 00:04
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger addition wierdness
Dave Page wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new
Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger addition wierdness
Hi Dave.
It is repaired in this.:-)
Please Apply it.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger
to a table
] Trigger addition wierdness
Hi Dave.
The humor of today's cvs is ill.:-)
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
Hmm, shouldn't be a bug, the exterminator said he got all of those
last week...
I'll have to have a play. Meanwhile, I'm hacking the Query
Hi Dave.
It is repaired in this.:-)
Please Apply it.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger
to a table
that already had one. When the new node was added to the
treeview, it
took the name of the
Hi Andreas,
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger to a table
that already had one. When the new node was added to the treeview, it
took the name of the existing trigger, not the new one. A refresh
cleared it up.
I had a quick look at the code but couldn't see anything
Dave Page wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger to a table
that already had one. When the new node was added to the treeview, it
took the name of the existing trigger, not the new one. A refresh
cleared it up.
I had a quick look at the code but couldn't
