[pgadmin-hackers] automake-1.11

2009-08-20 Thread Timon
can't run bootstrap with automake-1.11-2.fc11.noarch, which allready in updates-testing repo. I use this line: aclocal && autoheader && automake --foreign --add-missing --copy && autoconf -- All bugs reserved

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Automake error

2006-06-16 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Peter Eisentraut > Sent: 16 June 2006 14:53 > To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Automake error > > In the current svn, I had t

[pgadmin-hackers] Automake error

2006-06-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
In the current svn, I had to make the following change, otherwise automake would refuse to complete: Index: Makefile.am === --- Makefile.am (Revision 5229) +++ Makefile.am (Arbeitskopie) @@ -51,13 +51,9 @@ $(top_srcdir)/docs/

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-10 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 November 2005 16:47 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake > > > Is this OK now (following an svn update)? > > I get quite some wa

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04 To: Dave Page Cc: pgadmin-hackers Subject: Re: automake Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 Novembe

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-10 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: automake > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>S

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39 To: Dave Page Cc: pgadmin-hackers Subject: Re: automake Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a missing separator in line 377. automake-1.9 will claim

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-10 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: automake > > Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a > missing separator > in line 377. > > automake-1.9 will claim

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: On 9/11/05 8:22 pm, "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How to handle the [tar-ustar] option in configure.ac? I had to remove it in my setup. You probably need to upgrade to automake 1.9.6. When I was packaging 1.4 the other night, I suddenly realised that whoever

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-09 Thread Dave Page
On 9/11/05 8:22 pm, "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How to handle the [tar-ustar] option in configure.ac? I had to remove it > in my setup. You probably need to upgrade to automake 1.9.6. When I was packaging 1.4 the other night, I suddenly realised that whoever added the slony d

[pgadmin-hackers] automake

2005-11-09 Thread Andreas Pflug
How to handle the [tar-ustar] option in configure.ac? I had to remove it in my setup. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED