Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 13:01
To: Dave Page
Cc: Kurt Roeckx; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
CHANGELOG.txt could look like this, without release headers
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 December 2003 13:01
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Kurt Roeckx; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
>
>
> CHANGELOG.txt could look like th
Dave Page wrote:
Agreed, it is a little confusing. Suggestions for improvements anyone?
Regards, Dave.
CHANGELOG.txt could look like this, without release headers:
2003-12-03 AP *** fix connect to MULE_INTERNAL db
2003-12-02 AP fix acl property display
2003-12-0
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 December 2003 12:33
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Kurt Roeckx; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
>
> I must admit that the current CHANGELOG.txt
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Roeckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 December 2003 23:10
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:08:19PM -, Dave Page wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Roeckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 December 2003 23:10
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:08:19PM -, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:08:19PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I just finished bundling the source tarball, win32 builds and Slackware
> build of v1.0.2. This version is built using the new wx snapshot, which
> has also been added to the ftp mirrors.
I find the changelog on the website
Dave Page wrote:
Guys, any votes on what to do about this? I'm inclined to leave it as I
don't have another spare half day to re-roll everything at the moment.
Thoughts?
It's sad but IMHO we should roll it as it is now. This patch should have
been applied much earlier. It's more important to h
:08
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
>
> > That's a pgAdmin patch - I'm not sure what it has to do with the
> > wxWindows code?
>
> Oh, It is pgAdmin3-REL-1_0_0_PATCHES
>
> Since the sp
> That's a pgAdmin patch - I'm not sure what it has to do with the
> wxWindows code?
Oh, It is pgAdmin3-REL-1_0_0_PATCHES
Since the specification of the fireworks of stc changed,
if it is not made the same as the present pgadmin3-1.1.0dev, a color does not come..
regards,
Horoshi Saito
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 November 2003 14:55
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dave Page&
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I just finished bundling the source tarball, win32 builds and Slackware
> build of v1.0.2. This version is built using the new wx snapshot, which
> has also been added to the ftp mirrors.
>
> Please take a look and l
Hi Guys,
I just finished bundling the source tarball, win32 builds and Slackware
build of v1.0.2. This version is built using the new wx snapshot, which
has also been added to the ftp mirrors.
Please take a look and let me know if there are any problems - porters;
please update your release build
13 matches
Mail list logo
