> Thanks - applied.
>
> Thanks Dave.
Regards,
Nikhils
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Nikhil S wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If one clicks on Postgres (non EDB) database and tries to expand the
> schema
> > tab, then the current git head spits out an error. The offending query
> > contains the follo
Thanks - applied.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Nikhil S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If one clicks on Postgres (non EDB) database and tries to expand the schema
> tab, then the current git head spits out an error. The offending query
> contains the following comparison
>
> protype = 1;
>
> protype is of t
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 22:19, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Forgive me if I'm being dense... but doesn't this error indicate that
>> it *isn't* just that?
>
> No. Nikhil said (and the patch matches) that EDBAS, in PG mode or
> normal/Oracle mode, ha
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm being dense... but doesn't this error indicate that
> it *isn't* just that?
No. Nikhil said (and the patch matches) that EDBAS, in PG mode or
normal/Oracle mode, has the problem. On PostgreSQL, the problem
doesn't exist (
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 22:09, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:10, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:10, Dave Page wrote:
>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>>
>>>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:10, Dave Page wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG data
On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>
> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode
> for
> me. I too was puzz
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>>>
>>>
Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS
>>
On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
>>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS
>>> specific.
>>>
>>
>> Just checked. The version checker
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS specific.
>>
>
> Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number and
> also
> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS specific.
>
>
Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number and
also for a bool which is set to true in EDBAS mode. So yeah, this
> I"m not sure I understand. You first said that the bug is on regular
> PostgreSQL (and I can't reproduce it on 9.0 regular PostgreSQL). When
> you explain the bug and if I read correctly your patch, it fixes EDB
> database only.
>
> So is it a fix for EDB databases or PostgreSQL databases?
>
>
We
Le 07/02/2011 13:01, Nikhil S a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> If one clicks on Postgres (non EDB) database and tries to expand the schema
> tab, then the current git head spits out an error. The offending query
> contains the following comparison
>
> protype = 1;
>
> protype is of type char, so it expects t
Hi,
If one clicks on Postgres (non EDB) database and tries to expand the schema
tab, then the current git head spits out an error. The offending query
contains the following comparison
protype = 1;
protype is of type char, so it expects the RHS to be a char. However this
works ok against an EDB
15 matches
Mail list logo
