On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:46, Dave Page wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I assumed this was only going to be for 1.14 and not backpatched,
>> since you said previously that you expected no more than the one we
>> discussed before...
>
> Right, I said I hoped it w
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I assumed this was only going to be for 1.14 and not backpatched,
> since you said previously that you expected no more than the one we
> discussed before...
Right, I said I hoped it was the only thing. Turns out there was
something else th
I assumed this was only going to be for 1.14 and not backpatched,
since you said previously that you expected no more than the one we
discussed before...
So if this is the pattern, I switch over to objecting in principle to
backpatching what's essentially new features (support for a new
version of
Fix PPAS package support for 9.0
Branch
--
REL-1_12_0_PATCHES
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=2934ca66b2dbafb80534460448c82b776e50cc3a
Author: Nikhil S
Modified Files
--
CHANGELOG |1 +
pgadmin/schema/edbPacka
Fix PPAS package support for 9.0
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d06b67a56b246af1cb7676f89d92ae03a8b
Author: Nikhil S
Modified Files
--
CHANGELOG |1 +
pgadmin/schema/edbPackage.cpp | 1