Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build

2003-11-30 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 November 2003 20:15 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build Hi all, debian packages upload in progress :) Thanks :-) BTW, I stripped out all the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build

2003-11-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 November 2003 20:15 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build > > Hi all, > > debian packages upload in progress :) Thanks :-) B

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build

2003-11-29 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Hi all, debian packages upload in progress :) As for the first maintenance release, I had to take the snapshot's configure script and change the version in it to get the build ok. The benefit of this (with some other tricks added to the build process) is that SSL menus are ok on debian. I fin

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build

2003-11-29 Thread Dave Page
Thanks! > -Original Message- > From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 November 2003 01:19 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build > > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Page"

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build

2003-11-28 Thread Hiroshi Saito
- Original Message - From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi all, > > Following discussions I think that we will live with the STC bug in > v1.0.2. It doesn't affect functionality in any way, and is only really a > cosmetic issue. > > I will add the patch to the stable branch in case

[pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build

2003-11-28 Thread Dave Page
Hi all, Following discussions I think that we will live with the STC bug in v1.0.2. It doesn't affect functionality in any way, and is only really a cosmetic issue. I will add the patch to the stable branch in case we produce a 1.0.3. It is already in the dev branch. Porters: please go ahead and