Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The current values could be the settings ones or the table ones. If we
>> put the current values in the main textboxes, we will have to first
>> check that at least one textbox value is diffe
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current values could be the settings ones or the table ones. If we
> put the current values in the main textboxes, we will have to first
> check that at least one textbox value is different from the current
> value
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> Oh, yes - of course. I wonder if we should give the static text boxes
> a
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Oh, yes - of course. I wonder if we should give the static text boxes
a thin border so it's obviously
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Oh, yes - of course. I wonder if we should give the static text boxes
>>> a thin border so it's obviously they are there, even when empty? At
>>> the moment it just looks odd.
>>>
>> I tried
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh, yes - of course. I wonder if we should give the static text boxes
>> a thin border so it's obviously they are there, even when empty? At
>> the moment it just looks odd.
>>
>
> I tried many things but didn't manag
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> [...]
>>> I'll first work on the server status window (remember the first part:
>>> Replace the wxNotebook widget with the wxAuiNotebook so us
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It seems at the right place to me. There are three columns on this tab:
>> first one for the labels, second one for the text box, and third one for
>> static texts showing current values.
>
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> [...]
>> I'll first work on the server status window (remember the first part:
>> Replace the wxNotebook widget with the wxAuiNotebook so users can close
>> tabs and rearrange tabs order via drag-and-drop.) When the first pa
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sure seems a lot of work. We can't just replace the wxNotebook with a
> wxAuiNotebook in the XRC files. I tried yesterday and it didn't work :-/
>
> AFAICT, we need to write some code about a wxAuiManager and its pa
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Well that may lead to some interestingly messy desktops (imagine -
>>> separated tabs as far as the eye can see :-p ), but it could be useful
>>> too. How does it solve this problem though?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well that may lead to some interestingly messy desktops (imagine -
>> separated tabs as far as the eye can see :-p ), but it could be useful
>> too. How does it solve this problem though?
>>
>
> wxAuiNotebook tabs can
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>> [...]
It's also a real shame that tabs cannot scroll on the mac - having the
dialogue extra wide doesn't look so nice :-(.
>>>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Dave Page a écrit :
>> [...]
>>> It's also a real shame that tabs cannot scroll on the mac - having the
>>> dialogue extra wide doesn't look so nice :-(.
>>
>> It's even less nice when yo
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Dave Page a écrit :
> [...]
>> It's also a real shame that tabs cannot scroll on the mac - having the
>> dialogue extra wide doesn't look so nice :-(.
>
> It's even less nice when you open an existing table because there is one
> more tab...
>
One other way to fix t
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems at the right place to me. There are three columns on this tab:
> first one for the labels, second one for the text box, and third one for
> static texts showing current values.
Oh, yes - of course. I wonder
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I also get a crash if I try to open the New Table dialogue. I suspect
>>> that is the possible incompatibility that you were worried about,
>>> though I guess it could be related to
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>> Back on this. The plan took a lot more time than I initially thought.
>>> Anyways, here is the v5 patch updated.
>>>
>> I'm tired for sure... here is th
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> [...]
>> Back on this. The plan took a lot more time than I initially thought.
>> Anyways, here is the v5 patch updated.
>>
>
> I'm tired for sure... here is the patch.
:-(
Well it looks
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> [...]
> Back on this. The plan took a lot more time than I initially thought.
> Anyways, here is the v5 patch updated.
>
I'm tired for sure... here is the patch.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
enablingsqltextfield.20080826.patch.bz
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>> I prefer to add sizing to all (properties') dialogs. This is a work I can
>> do, step by step. I think I should follow these steps in this order:
>>
>> * one patch for each dialog to ad
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you also check on Windows. No issue found?
No, I don't have Windows to hand at the moment. I'm sure it will be
fine here though if it works OK for you. Windows is pretty predictable
in that way :-)
> I prefer
Dave Page a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The last patch I sent works on GTK+. When I try it on Windows, it works for
dlgFunction and dlgTrigger and doesn't with all other dlg*. I tried to
understand what could be wrong with dlgDatabase. dl
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last patch I sent works on GTK+. When I try it on Windows, it works for
> dlgFunction and dlgTrigger and doesn't with all other dlg*. I tried to
> understand what could be wrong with dlgDatabase. dlgFunction already
Dave Page a écrit :
(apologies for not reviewing the latest patch yet - we moved offices
on Monday so I've been tied up with that for the last few days)
No problem, don't worry :)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I worked on the remaining issue
(apologies for not reviewing the latest patch yet - we moved offices
on Monday so I've been tied up with that for the last few days)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I worked on the remaining issue tonight and it seems I can fix it this way:
> I add
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
[...]
The patch attached fixed some issues:
* The "Are you sure..." message is displayed only when "Read Only" is
checked.
* No button is the default on the "Are you sure" message (which has a
weird behaviour... hitting Esc will validate the dialog and the user
Dave Page a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm at the PostgreSQL booth, for the RMLL in Mont-de-Marsan
(http://rmll.info). I'm trying the wifi system :)
:-)
Here is the patch that fixes your issue on Win32. Works great on Win32 and
Linu
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm at the PostgreSQL booth, for the RMLL in Mont-de-Marsan
> (http://rmll.info). I'm trying the wifi system :)
:-)
> Here is the patch that fixes your issue on Win32. Works great on Win32 and
> Linux... I'm not sure
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Dave Page a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. I thought we didn't hide UI objects, only disable them, to get
a more
consistant UI.
On a single dialogue we disable objects so that dialogue will always
have
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like "Lock DDL". Perhaps "Read only DDL" would please you more ?
Nah, I like that even less.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@po
Dave Page a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. I thought we didn't hide UI objects, only disable them, to get a more
consistant UI.
On a single dialogue we disable objects so that dialogue will always
have the same layout no matter what
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done. I thought we didn't hide UI objects, only disable them, to get a more
> consistant UI.
On a single dialogue we disable objects so that dialogue will always
have the same layout no matter what server you're conne
Dave Page a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Page a écrit :
When you open a properties dialogue, it gets passed a pointer to the
pgObject which it may use right up until it is closed. If you refresh
part of the tree, you delete and recr
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>>
>> When you open a properties dialogue, it gets passed a pointer to the
>> pgObject which it may use right up until it is closed. If you refresh
>> part of the tree, you delete and recreate all t
Dave Page a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That can be
potentially dangerous if the user has another property dialogue for a
sibling object open though (actually that's an issue now iirc - this
would just make it far more likely to occur).
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That can be
>> potentially dangerous if the user has another property dialogue for a
>> sibling object open though (actually that's an issue now iirc - this
>> would just make it far more likely to occur).
>>
>
> What
Dave Page a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, this works on my local branch but I still have one issue with it: if the
user change the name of a newly created object in the SQL text field, the
treeview will display the name available in th
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, this works on my local branch but I still have one issue with it: if the
> user change the name of a newly created object in the SQL text field, the
> treeview will display the name available in the name field, n
Dave Page a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Option 1 seems not very user friendly to me. Are you against option 2? if
yes, why?
Yes, because it's inconsistent to offer the feature in all but two
dialogues. With option 1, the worst that wil
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Option 1 seems not very user friendly to me. Are you against option 2? if
> yes, why?
Yes, because it's inconsistent to offer the feature in all but two
dialogues. With option 1, the worst that will happen is the user
Dave Page a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grmbl... There's a big flaw in my patch. You're right once again.
Meh. It's happened a couple of times now :-)
hehe
Problem is, pgAdmin divide the queries to launch in two groups, only for
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grmbl... There's a big flaw in my patch. You're right once again.
Meh. It's happened a couple of times now :-)
> Problem is, pgAdmin divide the queries to launch in two groups, only for
> some objects : database and
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I'd forgotten about that. We do it because it allows us to run
> non-transaction safe DDL in separate transactions (which is required
> in 8.3). Actually, this is not a major issue - all that will happen is
> that the ser
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally, here is the prototype. As I first talked about this one year
ago, I
will summarize the idea : adding a checkbox on the SQL tab of an
object's
properties to le
Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally, here is the prototype. As I first talked about this one year ago, I
will summarize the idea : adding a checkbox on the SQL tab of an object's
properties to let the user change the SQL quer
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally, here is the prototype. As I first talked about this one year ago, I
> will summarize the idea : adding a checkbox on the SQL tab of an object's
> properties to let the user change the SQL query. Checking will
Dave Page a écrit :
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
[...]
Ideas ? Comments ?
I think I'd like to see a prototype so we can get a feel for how it
would work and what might explode. It shouldn't be too hard to do - just
add an option to the SQL tab, and when selected, lock the tabset to that
tab. Th
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at the new features of DBVisualizer and found something
that please me. I don't know if you remember this old thread :
http://www.pgadmin.org/archives/pgadmin-hackers/2007-03/msg4.php
I want to be able to change the generated SQL on object di
49 matches
Mail list logo
