Re: table OCX control

2002-03-09 Thread Tim Finch
> >No commercial controls thank you. Standard redistributable Microsoft ones, >or our own only. Too many licencing and compatibility problems otherwise. > >Regards, Dave. thought as much, no worries, just thought it was worth checking out. Hey! I like a challenge! Tim.

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-08 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 08 March 2002 11:37 > To: Mark A. Taff > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control > > > In fact if we came up with a method of doing it Registry wise then > something like the vi

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-08 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 08 March 2002 11:54 > To: Mark A. Taff > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control > > > You're right, Yes it should and no its not. Now to this end, > whats the gas > on us usin

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-08 Thread Tim Finch
At 14:35 07/03/2002 -0800, Mark A. Taff wrote: >I like the control. Some discussion points: > >1. I think the control need to be resizable, both by a minimize button and >by border dragging. Yes. However I thought this might be best implemented by the DiagramView (DV) control into which the Dat

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-08 Thread Tim Finch
>Mark's reply: I don't think we are going to pressured at all for space. The >form opens up at the current default of 80% of available screen space, and >all but one pane can be hidden by the user. So they could easily have just >the diagramming pane take up their entire screen, if they wanted

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-07 Thread Mark A. Taff
I like the control. Some discussion points: 1. I think the control need to be resizable, both by a minimize button and by border dragging. 2. I like the notion of each instance of the control having the appropriate icon (table, view, function, etc). 3. The diagramming pane should also have scrol

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-07 Thread Mark A. Taff
I'll do a better job of quoting below. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Finch Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control Dear all, Firstly may I apologise to Mark. The

Re: table OCX control

2002-03-07 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 07 March 2002 11:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control > > > Dear all, > > Firstly may I apologise to Mark. The work I outline in this > message was > done before I realise