Hi Support,
We are running on Postgres version 8.2.10 on linux. We want to install pgagent
for scheduling the jobs.
Just wanted to check that is there any version connection between pgagent and
Postgres
For example we could see following version of pgagent on the website:-
pgAgent-2.0.0-
On 06/24/2009 11:45 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 06/24/2009 11:12 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Andres Freund
wrote:
On 06/24/2009 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freund
wrote:
I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1
On 06/24/2009 11:12 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 06/24/2009 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freundwrote:
I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1)' with
'(size_t)(-1)' which works on 32bi
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> For some fun I tried loading a 1GB+ file and it crashed earlier
> (wxUtfFile::Read) ;-)
You have a strange definition of 'fun' sir!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pg
On 06/24/2009 12:13 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
For some fun I tried loading a 1GB+ file and it crashed earlier
(wxUtfFile::Read) ;-)
You have a strange definition of 'fun' sir!
I got the idea from a client trying to restore a plain pg_dump fil
On 06/24/2009 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1)' with
'(size_t)(-1)' which works on 32bit but not on 64bit.
Thanks Andres - patch applied.
I havent read very much of the code, but at a very
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 06/24/2009 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>>> I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1)' with
>>> '(size_t)(-1)' which works on 32bit but not on 64bit.
>>
>> Thanks
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1)' with
> '(size_t)(-1)' which works on 32bit but not on 64bit.
>
Thanks Andres - patch applied.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-supp
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Miles Elam wrote:
> Thanks to a note from Arthur, I gave his technique a try. Indeed, I'm using
> an Asus Eee PC 900A.
> The alt-drag technique works perfectly on Ubuntu 9.04 Netbook Remix on a
> 1024x600 screen. A little inconvenient, but then so are netbooks some
Thanks to a note from Arthur, I gave his technique a try. Indeed, I'm using an
Asus Eee PC 900A.
The alt-drag technique works perfectly on Ubuntu 9.04 Netbook Remix on a
1024x600 screen. A little inconvenient, but then so are netbooks sometimes.
A worthwhile workaround to be sure.
Thanks Arthu
10 matches
Mail list logo
