> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 10:07
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: Removal of Revision Control
>
>
> Le Jeudi 2 Mai 2002 10:25, vous avez écrit :
> > What do you mean by object tracing? If you mean
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 09:18
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: Removal of Revision Control
>
>
> Le Mercredi 1 Mai 2002 23:09, Dave Page a écrit :
> > Do
Le Mercredi 1 Mai 2002 23:09, Dave Page a écrit :
> Does anyone have any objections or comments?
Dear all,
There were discussions on hackers months ago about rollback using WAL (point
to point recovery?) and object tracing (something like SET TRACE ON ...). I
don't think it will be implemented
> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 00:31
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: Removal of Revision Control
>
>
> Thats fair. The ability to rollback most changes isn't
> over
Thats fair. The ability to rollback most changes isn't overly useful.
What is useful is the ability to replay commands on another database.
I suggest a good replacement would be a simple 'log' mode which writes
text based queries to a log file. PGAdmin should be able to play an
arbitrary text f
