Re: [pgadmin-support] SQL query editor

2002-04-03 Thread Tim Finch, FosterFinch Ltd
This makes sense. I guess for now, however, we just continue the development of the Graphical Editor in the standard way and worry about dll-ing it later on. Tim >Not a good idea. Security is the job of the DBMS - anything we can do with >pgAdmin could be overidden by a registry savvy user any

Re: [pgadmin-support] SQL query editor

2002-04-03 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 03 April 2002 09:48 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; G. A. Reina > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] SQL query editor > > > At 07:21 30/03/2002 +, Dave Page wrote: > &g

Re: [pgadmin-support] SQL query editor

2002-04-03 Thread Tim Finch
At 07:21 30/03/2002 +, Dave Page wrote: >No, it doesn't I'm afraid. It's possible that it could be modularised and >seperated though, and it's a pretty good idea, so if I get a chance I'll >look into it. > >Regards, Dave. Is it worth us thinking sbout this in terms of the graphical editor w

Re: [pgadmin-support] SQL query editor

2002-03-29 Thread Dave Page
No, it doesn't I'm afraid. It's possible that it could be modularised and seperated though, and it's a pretty good idea, so if I get a chance I'll look into it. Regards, Dave. _Original message Subject:[pgadmin-support] SQL query editor Sender: "G. A. Reina" <[E