Yes, that is true. I agree. Thanks Tatsuo.
From: Tatsuo Ishii
To: sandee...@yahoo.com
Cc: pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 2:00:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] query regarding connection pooling
> That means, even if the f
From: Tatsuo Ishii
To: sandee...@yahoo.com
Cc: pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 2:00:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] query regarding connection pooling
> That means, even if the free connection is available in the pool, pgp
> That means, even if the free connection is available in the pool, pgpool
> starts
> a new connection. I think, in terms of connection pooling, pgbouncer looks
> better than pgpool. Because, pgbouncer will always first check in the pool
> for
> the connection and if found, will reuse it.
Yes
.
From: Tatsuo Ishii
To: sandee...@yahoo.com
Cc: pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
Sent: Tue, January 11, 2011 2:59:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] query regarding connection pooling
> Hi,
>
> I'm using "pgpool II 3.0.1" against PPAS8.4 an
> Hi,
>
> I'm using "pgpool II 3.0.1" against PPAS8.4 and testing the connection
> pooling
> feature.
>
> Here is my settings in pgpool.conf related to this feature:
> num_init_children = 3
> max_pool = 1
> child_life_time = 0
> child_max_connections = 0
> client_idle_limit = 0
>
> Here is wha
Hi,
I'm using "pgpool II 3.0.1" against PPAS8.4 and testing the connection pooling
feature.
Here is my settings in pgpool.conf related to this feature:
num_init_children = 3
max_pool = 1
child_life_time = 0
child_max_connections = 0
client_idle_limit = 0
Here is what I did:
1. edb-psql -U enter
