[ADMIN] Web hosting and PostgreSQL?

2000-06-02 Thread Thomas
Anyone knows of any good web hosting that support PostgreSQL? Regards, Thomas.

Re: [ADMIN] Re: few more securiry questions :-)

2000-06-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
R D writes: > You can inplement some option in the postmaster to > trust to some user from localhost, for example: > "postmaster --trust postgres &" But the problem is that there's no way to know by what user a given connection is actually initiated -- unless you use some authentication mechani

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] take it off line kids

2000-06-02 Thread al
agreed to all I profusely appologize for all ruffled feathers

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread Anthony E. Greene
At 15:23 2000-06-02 -0500, al wrote: >your request the everyone on this list stop using reply-ALL because YOU >dislike getting multiple copies of a reply is vain and conceited to put >it nicely I suggest you re-read my messages. I never asked anyone to do anything. I made *an offer* to people who

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread Anthony E. Greene
At 15:16 2000-06-02 -0500, al wrote: >simply ignoring a problem wont make it go away The above statement does not reflect the course of action I took. Regardless, my solution is not intended to make the problem "go away". It is intended to save me the time and effort it would take to: 1. Attemp

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread al
your request the everyone on this list stop using reply-ALL because YOU dislike getting multiple copies of a reply is vain and conceited to put it nicely why should all of us need to install/edit/admin procmail to please you? THAT is why I said you were on the wrong list you need to be on the "I

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread al
> It has one advantage over the one you advocate (and which I tried): it works. > ..^..? So You run this list?? You say you tried to fix it?? otherwise you tried nothing simply ignoring a problem wont make it go away I advo

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Ragnar Kjørstad
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 02:26:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I know about Informix, but I heard Oracle was moving away from raw > > devices, and the speed improvement was only a few percentage points. > > For Informix it's far more than a few percentage points; and then > when you add

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread pyz
> > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > Most think that raw devices are a pain and offer little performance > > > > > improvement and lots of portability and coding problems. > > > > > > > > I don't know how much it is a performance improvement (someone say > > 10-20%), > >

Re: [ADMIN] Database/table limits ??????

2000-06-02 Thread joe briggs
I get 100 MBps on 4 7200's, 2 on each SCSI-UW channel, all stipped into a single /dev/md0 RAID-0 using 256-K chunks on RH62 and Intel Xeon 500 MHZ. Fiber Channel drives are MUCH slower. On Fri, 02 Jun 2000, Chris Albertson wrote: > Ohgaki Yasuo wrote: > > > > I understand OID is signed integer

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Most think that raw devices are a pain and offer little performance > > > > improvement and lots of portability and coding problems. > > > > > > I don't know how much it is a performance improvement (someone say > 10-20%), > > > but Bruce is p

Re: [ADMIN] Database/table limits ??????

2000-06-02 Thread Chris Albertson
Ohgaki Yasuo wrote: > > I understand OID is signed integer which go up to 2^31. > Almost any case it would be sufficient. (It's sufficient for me, at least) > > What I really want to know is the same as original poster. > > > > 8. Can a database be spread over more than one disk drive? Yes, b

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Max Pyziur
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Most think that raw devices are a pain and offer little performance > > > improvement and lots of portability and coding problems. > > > > I don't know how much it is a performance improvement (someone say 10-20%), > > but Bruce is probably right, i

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Most think that raw devices are a pain and offer little performance > > > improvement and lots of portability and coding problems. > > > > I don't know how much it is a performance improvement (someone say 10-20%), > > but Bruce is probably right,

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > > > > I understand OID is signed integer which go up to 2^31. > > > > Almost any case it would be sufficient. (It's sufficient for me, at least) > > > > > > > > What I really want to know is the sa

Re: [ADMIN] Importing table from mysql

2000-06-02 Thread Anthony E. Greene
At 11:17 2000-06-02 +0530, Pragati Sagar wrote: >I already have a database created in mysql. But now I want to shift from >mysql to postgresql but my problem is how to convert mysql database to >postgresql. How will I import the tables from mysql? Please help me with >this as I have not been able

Re: [ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > Most think that raw devices are a pain and offer little performance > > improvement and lots of portability and coding problems. > > I don't know how much it is a performance improvement (someone say 10-20%), > but Bruce is probably right, it is a huge work and with dependence on > hardwar

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread Anthony E. Greene
At 09:41 2000-06-02 -0500, al wrote: >what a load! > >the solution is to FIX ONE LIST SERVER >not RIG A THOUSAND PROCMAILS > >what a backwards solution It has one advantage over the one you advocate (and which I tried): it works. >when something is setup wrong you fix it >dont adjust EVERYTHING

Re: [ADMIN] Accessing the database

2000-06-02 Thread Daryl Herzmann
Pragati, I am assuming that your webserver is running as user "nobody". If that is the case, then you need to make sure that the user "nobody" can access the table. If your scripts only do selects on the table, then this command would do the trick GRANT SELECT on table1 to nobody

Re: [ADMIN] Accessing the database

2000-06-02 Thread Jan T. Kim
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 04:35:29PM +0530, Pragati Sagar wrote: > Hi! > I connecting the postgreSQL database through the following code: > > $conn=pg_connect("","","","",""); > $index=pg_exec($conn,"select * from table1"); > ?> > > On execution of this code from the browser, following error app

[ADMIN] Re: [BUGS] double dumps for all objects with pg_dump

2000-06-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
My guess is that you have either duplicates in pg_database or pg_shadow, but they have unique indexes so I don't know how that could happen. > hi! > > i get double dumps for all tables, indices and acl's in my databases when > trying to do a simple "pg_dump "! > > i'm using postgresql 7.0 on li

Re: [ADMIN] Database/table limits ??????

2000-06-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > > Bruce Momjian schrieb: > > > I have added this to the PostgreSQL FAQ. Thanks. > > But you haven't done it yet, right ? > > I found nothing about the questions at > ftp.postgresql.org/pub/v7.0.1/postgresql.7.0.1.docs.tar.gz. That tarball is not updated, only the web site at this time.

[ADMIN] Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Norbert Meissner
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > > I understand OID is signed integer which go up to 2^31. > > Almost any case it would be sufficient. (It's sufficient for me, at least) > > > > What I really want to know is the same as original poster. > > > > > > 8. Can a database be spread

[ADMIN] Re: Future plans for raw devices ?

2000-06-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > > > I understand OID is signed integer which go up to 2^31. > > > Almost any case it would be sufficient. (It's sufficient for me, at least) > > > > > > What I really want to know is the same as original poster. > > > > > > > > 8. Can a data

[ADMIN] Accessing the database

2000-06-02 Thread Pragati Sagar
Hi! I connecting the postgreSQL database through the following code: ","","","",""); $index=pg_exec($conn,"select * from table1"); ?> On execution of this code from the browser, following error appears : Warning: PostgresSQL query failed: ERROR: table1: Permission denied. in /home/httpd/html/sc

[ADMIN] CYGWIN1.DLL

2000-06-02 Thread Marcel
Hello admin ! Where I get dll for postgresql 7.0 for WinNT (cygwin1.dll) Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ADMIN] Importing table from mysql

2000-06-02 Thread Pragati Sagar
Hi! I already have a database created in mysql. But now I want to shift from mysql to postgresql but my problem is how to convert mysql database to postgresql. How will I import the tables from mysql? Please help me with this as I have not been able to find any diocumentaion on the net. Thanks A

[ADMIN] Re: [NOVICE] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread al
what a load! the solution is to FIX ONE LIST SERVER not RIG A THOUSAND PROCMAILS what a backwards solution when something is setup wrong you fix it dont adjust EVERYTHING ELSE are you a MS programmer?

Re: [ADMIN] what is this?

2000-06-02 Thread Ryan Kirkpatrick
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, [iso-8859-1] Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2036 at 07:36:11AM +, LeSI wrote: > > Jun 1 00:59:06 upa kernel: postmaster(11156): unaligned trap at > > 00012013e320: 00011fff9d05 28 1 > > > > how can i fix it? > > I'm on thin ice here, but I'm giving it

[ADMIN] Error message on loading

2000-06-02 Thread Bob Cregan
When loading a dumped database I get the ERROR message psql:/tmp/savedump:574: ERROR: btree: index item size 3128 exceeds maximum 2717 The database was dumped from postgresql 6.5 using that versions pg_dumpall and was loaded into postgresql 7.0 Any ideas? Bob -- Bob Cregan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ADMIN] TR: WAL status

2000-06-02 Thread Nicolas Huillard
Nobody seems to read on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list... Does anyone know anything about my question here ? Nicolas Huillard -Message d'origine- De: Nicolas Huillard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: mardi 30 mai 2000 15:04 À: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet: WAL status Hello, Searchin

[ADMIN] [OT] How to avoid using Reply-All on this list

2000-06-02 Thread Anthony E. Greene
If you don't have access to procmail and formail on your mail server, you can ignore this message. When I post to lists that don't add a Reply-To header to list messages, repliers often use the Reply-All function of their mail client. This sends one reply to the list and another to me. I dislike

Re: [ADMIN] Database/table limits ??????

2000-06-02 Thread Norbert Meissner
Bruce Momjian schrieb: > I have added this to the PostgreSQL FAQ. Thanks. But you haven't done it yet, right ? I found nothing about the questions at ftp.postgresql.org/pub/v7.0.1/postgresql.7.0.1.docs.tar.gz. Norbert

Re: [ADMIN] Re: few more securiry questions :-)

2000-06-02 Thread R D
--- Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Albertson writes: > > > > > 2.Why the authentication system is not > integrated in > > > > the system databases of pgSQL,like in MySQL > for > > > > example? > > > > > > Because there's a bootstrapping problem: You > would have to connect

[ADMIN] double dumps for all objects with pg_dump

2000-06-02 Thread guenther mair
hi! i get double dumps for all tables, indices and acl's in my databases when trying to do a simple "pg_dump "! i'm using postgresql 7.0 on linux (kernel 2.2.14, almost all libraries out of slackware 7). is there any known bug? thanks! gunny ps: please include me in your replies, since i'm

Re: [SQL] Re: [ADMIN] create view security

2000-06-02 Thread Jan Wieck
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Wallingford, Ted writes: > > > I am using 6.3 in this case. > > I'm sorry but that is pre-historic era around here and no one really > remembers what the problems might have been back then (other than that > they were surely plenty). Upgrading might be your best bet on al