This is not facetious, honestly, but what about google?
site:archives.postgresql.org +OS X +terminal
returns just a couple of pages...
Of course there's no date ordering as such, although +2003 works
fairly well, as does +[ADMIN].
Not a panacea I know, but it's quick, and it does have the
I am unable to find the adress to unsuscribe, could you please help me and give me
that adress...
thanks for advance!!
Message d'origine
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 17:21:05 -0300 (ADT)
De: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: Somasekhar Bangalore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copie à: Andrew Sullivan
what does the error in postgres.log pg_recvbuf : unexpected EOF on client mean?
thanks in advance
Sree Get MSN 8 and help protect your children with advanced parental controls.
Priya G writes:
what does the error in postgres.log pg_recvbuf : unexpected EOF on client mean?
The client closed the connection (on the operating system level) before
properly closing the session (on the PostgreSQL level). Either you have a
buggy client that does that out of principle, or the
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 09:42, Ian Barwick wrote:
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 00:26, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
okay, first off ... what URL? I've been working on, and testing,
archives all week, and altho getting things down below a 2min search
appears to be near impossible (anyone
I would like to dump select tables from a database (omitting some tables).
It looks like pg_dump only allows you to dump the entire database or
select single tables to dump. Is there a way to specify to pg_dump a
list of tables to dump (or to omit)?
I can dump all the desired tables as single
Any Help
I recently upgraded to 7.3.4 from 7.3.2. Prior to the upgrade I used
pg_dump -a olddatafile for just data and pg_dump -s oldschemafile
for schema using the pg_dump utility from 7.3.2. After a successful
install of 7.3.4, I created the database then went on to successful
psql -f
creid writes:
I recently upgraded to 7.3.4 from 7.3.2. Prior to the upgrade I used
pg_dump -a olddatafile for just data and pg_dump -s oldschemafile
for schema using the pg_dump utility from 7.3.2. After a successful
install of 7.3.4, I created the database then went on to successful
Hi
I am trying to run Postgres on Windows as a service and after a bit of
playing around I can run it from within Cygwin and I can install it as a
service OK but when I try to start the service I get the following error:
IpcMemoryCreate: shmget(key=5432001, size=1499136, 03600) failed: Not
Renney Thomas wrote:
You have to install the procedural language into each database as such:
1. su - postgres
2. createlang plpgsql [your dbname here]
I still think we should display a 'hint' that createlang might fix the
problem when we report a problem with a missing language --- these
while postgres is pretty solid under unixes,
i am just curious as regards to the stability of cygwin+Postgres combo under win2k?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:57 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ADMIN] Problems
Yuji Shinozaki wrote:
I would like to dump select tables from a database (omitting some tables).
It looks like pg_dump only allows you to dump the entire database or
select single tables to dump. Is there a way to specify to pg_dump a
list of tables to dump (or to omit)?
I can dump
please remove me from the list
_
MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map
Just FYI, SELECT last_value FROM my_sequence; is NOT transaction safe,
i.e. other transactions may increment the counter between the time you run
that query and the next that uses the value.
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Pierre Couderc wrote:
Thank you all.
SELECT last_value FROM my_sequence;
is
yes please unsubscrib me
From: AlmawElias Fantahun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADMIN] unsubscrib
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:06:33 +
please remove me from the list
_
MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month
Hi List,
I trying to increase performance in my PostgreSQL but there is something
wrong.when I run this SQL for the first time it takes 1 min. 40 seconds to
return, but when I run it for the second time it takes more than 2 minutes, and
I should retunr faster than the first time.
Does
Rhaoni Chiu Pereira writes:
I trying to increase performance in my PostgreSQL but there is something
wrong.when I run this SQL for the first time
Which SQL?
it takes 1 min. 40 seconds to
return, but when I run it for the second time it takes more than 2 minutes, and
I should retunr
17 matches
Mail list logo
