"Tena Sakai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed postgres v 8.2.4 on a new linux server (not upgrade,
> but a virgin install) and created a couple of users. For the
> sake of clarity and concreteness, I will call this server S824.
> There is another server on the network where S824 resides t
From: "Tena Sakai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: [ADMIN] getting service from a local server (v8.2.4)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:13:11 -0700
Hi,
I am new to postgres and having a strange problem. Please help.
I installed postgres v 8.2.4 on a new linux server (not upgrade,
but a virgin
Hi,
I am new to postgres and having a strange problem. Please help.
I installed postgres v 8.2.4 on a new linux server (not upgrade,
but a virgin install) and created a couple of users. For the
sake of clarity and concreteness, I will call this server S824.
There is another server on the networ
As anyone used pgmemcache? I would like to look more into a but I'm
having problems installing the sql. I'm on OS X 10.4 and the sql there
are lines causing errors:
(e.g. AS '$libdir/pgmemcache', 'memcache_server_add' LANGUAGE 'C' STRICT;)
thanks for any input and also will version 1.2 come
Please disregard my last post about creating a schema. I found the answer.
You have to be connected to a database to create a schema in that database.
km4hr wrote:
>
> Thanks Milen. Assigning superuser role worked.
>
> Speaking of schema's, I logged in as user "postgres" and created a schema
Thanks Milen. Assigning superuser role worked.
Speaking of schema's, I logged in as user "postgres" and created a schema
called "schema1" as follows:
CREATE SCHEMA schema1 AUTHORIZATION newuser;
I then typed "\dn" and saw "schema1" in the list.
I then logged in as "newuser" and typed "\dn". "s
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Freitag, 29. Juni 2007 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > I have most entries split over several lines:
> >
> > Jun 29 19:56:40 db.xxx.xxx postgres[10640]: [5-1] DB=XXX U=XXX
> > H=1.1.1.1 16854186.2190 idleLOG: Verbindungsende: Sitzungszeit:
> > 0:01:22.10 Jun 29 19:56:40 db
John Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 'usesuper' bit for user "postgres" was set to 'f' by default in the
> pg_shadow table in my
> PostgreSQL 7.4.2 installation when I installed it on my OS X host.
I seriously, seriously doubt that there was no superuser by default.
> Any pointers on h
On 17.07-17:31, Mary Anderson wrote:
[ ... ]
> I am most worried about the second select, with its 'NOT EXISTS'
> statement slowing everything down. I would put appropriate indexes on
> this -- namely an index on series for data and an index on dhd for
> da_id. My user community is a bunch of
Greetings.
I have trawled the Web for answers but have found none to my problem.
The 'usesuper' bit for user "postgres" was set to 'f' by default in the
pg_shadow table in my
PostgreSQL 7.4.2 installation when I installed it on my OS X host.
My database is working fine (has been for a couple
Hi,
Is there a way to run CREATE TABLESOACE,DATABASE etc. winthin a stored
procedure?
Thanks
Danny
On Freitag, 29. Juni 2007 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I have most entries split over several lines:
>
> Jun 29 19:56:40 db.xxx.xxx postgres[10640]: [5-1] DB=XXX U=XXX
> H=1.1.1.1 16854186.2190 idleLOG: Verbindungsende: Sitzungszeit:
> 0:01:22.10 Jun 29 19:56:40 db.xxx.xxx postgres[10640]: [5-2]
> B
12 matches
Mail list logo