I would be glad on advice what might be the issue (or how I could narrow it
down)
with the non restoration of data from a postgres 7.1 database to a postgres
8 database.
The schema was dumped with
pg_dump -O -s databasename > database_schema_file_name
The data was dumped with
pg_dump -O -a databa
Hey Drew,
Correct. This will all depend on what sort of backup system you are after.
If you want to recover up to its existing state, you will need a script
that will nab the current log, located in the x_log dir, and backup this up
every x minutes. Along with this you will be backing up your WAL
Could it be the search path (schema) issue? Just a quick thought...
Regards,
Ben Kim
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Carol Walter wrote:
Hello,
I asked this question yesterday, but perhaps I did so in an unintelligible
way. I didn't get any answer that time. Someone usually answers my
questions, s
Looks like the relevant Visual C runtime library ( VC80.CRT 32 bit ) needs
installing first...
Steve
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:42:54 -0500
"Brandon Dybala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried installing PostgreSQL 8.3.3 on Vista Business, and initdb failed
> to start during the installer. I'd re
The problem is solved. It wasn't until I tried to work with the
database in PhpPgAdmin that I got an error message that pointed me to
the solution. I had not granted privileges to the schemas. I had
never had to grant privs to a schema before and the documentation
seemed to indicate that
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Richard Broersma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Carol Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I granted the app_admin role to my user name. When I try to
>> describe the table using the "\d" psql command, it tells me there are no
>> r
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Carol Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I granted the app_admin role to my user name. When I try to
> describe the table using the "\d" psql command, it tells me there are no
> relations.
I believe that this link explains the problem you are seeing:
http://www
Hello,
I asked this question yesterday, but perhaps I did so in an
unintelligible way. I didn't get any answer that time. Someone
usually answers my questions, so I must not have asked it very well.
I have a new database that I'm building for a faculty research
project. I created a ro
Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to get pg_dumpall to exclude a table or
> do I have to dump the tables indivually with pg_dump?
No, pg_dumpall doesn't have any provision for passing different
switches for different databases to its invocations of pg_dump.
Recommended practice he
Thanks Steve.
If I understand your comment regarding the 16MB limit, it means I should not
worry about the WAL file not being copied to the archive directory.
I hope this also means a subsequent attempt to restore the db will successfully
work since the WAL file is still in the pg_xlog directo
Abraham, Danny wrote:
> Application cannot connect to PG after successful recovery.
>
> Happens on both Vista and Server 2008. never happens on XP/2003.
>
> 2008-08-27 14:05:03.484 FATAL: the database system is starting up
> 2008-08-27 14:05:03.609 LOG: database system is ready
> 2008-08-27 14:
Is there a way to get pg_dumpall to exclude a table or
do I have to dump the tables indivually with pg_dump? I have
one very large table that never changes and it'd be nice
not to have a copy of it in every backup (especially since
the backups get sent to another machine over the Internet).
--
S
I tried installing PostgreSQL 8.3.3 on Vista Business, and initdb failed
to start during the installer. I'd really like to make this install as
automatic as possible since I'm installing PostgreSQL as part of my
application installer process. It would be best if the user does not
have to deal wit
2008/8/28 John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to check which version of Postgres is installed on a
> particular Linux box without query the RPM database?
>
> For instance, is there a "psql --version" command, or something similar,
> that I can use?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> --
> Sent vi
Hi,
Is there a way to check which version of Postgres is installed on a
particular Linux box without query the RPM database?
For instance, is there a "psql --version" command, or something similar,
that I can use?
Thanks,
John
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.or
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:58:33 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] PITR - base backup question
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Richard Broersma wrote
Application cannot connect to PG after successful recovery.
Happens on both Vista and Server 2008. never happens on XP/2003.
2008-08-27 14:05:03.484 FATAL: the database system is starting up
2008-08-27 14:05:03.609 LOG: database system is ready
2008-08-27 14:05:10.218 LOG: could not receive da
Steve, thanks for your response and your question.
Ok, here is some clarification on the WAL file name used in the example below.
The WAL file name I used in the example is actually 00010088,
and the backup file name is 00010088.0089ED8C.backup.
The WAL file
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Valentin Bogdanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have got a script that is inserting, updating heavily at the moment. So, I
> want to turn fsync off to speed things up but I don't want to interrupt the
> script.
>
> If I do `postgresql reload` or `kil
Hi
I have solaris 10 update 5 installed. PostgreSQL with SMF is shipped
with Solaris 10 update 5.
I could see two services installed on the OS.
svcs postgresql
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
disabled 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
I f
20 matches
Mail list logo