Re: [ADMIN] Canot access PostgreSQL via psql -h (Vmware Fusion)

2012-08-24 Thread Kevin Grittner
CS DBA cs_...@consistentstate.com wrote: I've fired up 2 CentOS 6.2 VM's via vmware fusion 5 (on a mac). psql -h 192.168.91.145 psql: could not connect to server: No route to host That problem has nothing to do with PostgreSQL; you might have better luck on a list related to the other

Re: [ADMIN] Canot access PostgreSQL via psql -h (Vmware Fusion)

2012-08-24 Thread Craig James
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: CS DBA cs_...@consistentstate.com wrote: I've fired up 2 CentOS 6.2 VM's via vmware fusion 5 (on a mac). psql -h 192.168.91.145 psql: could not connect to server: No route to host That problem has nothing to

Re: [ADMIN] Canot access PostgreSQL via psql -h (Vmware Fusion)

2012-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes: CS DBA cs_...@consistentstate.com wrote: psql: could not connect to server: No route to host That problem has nothing to do with PostgreSQL; you might have better luck on a list related to the other technologies. FWIW, on Linux I would

Re: [ADMIN] Canot access PostgreSQL via psql -h (Vmware Fusion)

2012-08-24 Thread Walter Hurry
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:35:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: No route to host doesn't have anything to do with whether there's anything listening on the target port ... what's more likely is that the OP mistyped the IP address, or else there's something wrong with his network layout, interface netmask