Not strictly on topic but I guess it is interesting for all of us
anyway. I work doing consulting job for a company called DBA Engenharia
de Sistemas that works as a contractor for a brazilian government
project called "Cadastramento Único" which is a project to centralize
all social-related gove
Try single quotes (') instead of double-quotes (").
-Bruno
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:12:03 -0700, David Bear said:
> I guess I'm too stupid to see the error, but I don't understand why
> the following fails.
>
>
> insert into person3 (asuid, fname, lname, addedby, addedon,
> slopbucket) values (
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm suspicious of a more subtle intermittent error.
Yeah, I am too, but so far none of the reporters have been cooperative
about providing more information :-(
Well, at least from me, I can tell you I gave all information I came up
with. One thing that I pointed out is this
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I am having a weird problem here. I have the automated process to
install PostgreSQL (8.0.1) on Windows 2000 machines. Besides installing
the database server itself, my process does the following:
1 - Runs initdb to created the database I will be using.
2 - Runs a SQL
Your Winsock stack is corrupted. You can try to sort it out by using a
program called "winsockxpfix".
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/winsockxpfix.html
-Bruno
Rodrigo Katsumoto Sakai wrote:
Hi, i'm working with PostgreSQL for a long time (about three years), but
always on Linux box. But rec
I am having a weird problem here. I have the automated process to
install PostgreSQL (8.0.1) on Windows 2000 machines. Besides installing
the database server itself, my process does the following:
1 - Runs initdb to created the database I will be using.
2 - Runs a SQL script that creates the
Hello.
I am not in front of my NT 4.0 machine right now so I won't be able to
give any specifics messages or anything at this point. In any case, it
seems PostgreSQL can't be installed (via the Windows install package) on
Windows NT 4.0 machines, giving an error about missing functions or
somet
I am not sure if I am doing something wrong or a hit a bug, so here it goes:
I am running PostgreSQL 8.0.1 under Windows 2000. We have this database
here which is really small and has a set of 5 functions. All the
functions are programmed using pgpsql so we used the functionality where
we can us
Hi Tom.
Thanks for the reply. I am sure this is not the case. I am doing test
dumps on my machine (only PostgreSQL 8.0.1 installed) and the server is
also running PostgreSQL 8.0.1.
-Bruno
Tom Lane wrote:
"Bruno G. Albuquerque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The problem is that whe
I am not sure if I am doing something wrong or a hit a bug, so here it goes:
I am running PostgreSQL 8.0.1 under Windows 2000. We have this database
here which is really small and has a set of 5 functions. All the
functions are programmed using pgpsql so we used the functionality where
we can use n
10 matches
Mail list logo