On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I talked to Dave Page and it seems the pginstaller (non-bitRock) Win32
>> > installers were _not_ moved fr
f I turn on all controls, if I turn it off, I
get the behaviour you describe. I'm not sure what else to suggest.
(and please, Dave, not Mr Page :-) )
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
--
Sent via pgsql-admin maili
ard pane.
- Select the 'Keyboard Shortcuts' tab
- At the bottom, select the Full keyboard access: All controls option.
or, just press Control+F7 from anywhere.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
--
ich can do
> more than assist you.
We don't have a converter, though we do have experience in this area
of course. Our Advanced Server product has direct support for pl/sql
however so you can run your code unmodified.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sen
nt of my work for the sake of
> knowledge share.
I think you forgot the attachment. It would be useful if you could add
it to the wiki though: http://wiki.postgresql.org/
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgre
l look at doing that. We need the SUSE builds also.
Great, thanks Simon. If you can commit to ongoing maintenance then
we'll get you on the packagers list so you can get advance notice of
releases and having input on the scheduling details.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb
rent version is 8.3.4 and I'm wondering why there
>> are no new rpm's for Opensuse ?!?!
>
> The answer is quite simply that no one is volunteering to do the work.
Oh, I thought you were looking after that build. If it's not being
maintained, we'll need to re
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Premil Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried that already, still the same error
It (using plpgsql instead of sql) works fine for me using your code.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing li
gt; DETAIL: Function's final statement must be a SELECT.
> CONTEXT: SQL function "check_for_null"
>
> Any suggestions why this happens ??
Choose pl/pgsql as the language, not SQL.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to know if I set the debug mode to 2 (-l 2) in the pgAgent
connection string it could spend much cpu processing.
I have other things running in the server and I don't like to create
problem to others.
Please stop cross posting to lot
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Qiu
LeiSent: 07 November 2005 09:12To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-admin@postgresql.orgSubject:
[webmaster] How can I join in the PostgreSql developing team
?
Dear webmaster:
I am glad to
w
Thanks - fix committed to svn.
Regards, Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bastiaan
WakkieSent: 03 October 2005 17:04To: Andreas
PflugCc: PostgreSQL-development; pgadmin-hackers;
pgsql-admin@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAd
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 September 2004 12:27
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Bender, Cheryl; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] windows docs?
>
?
> I'm th
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 July 2003 17:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Donald Fraser; [ADMIN]; [pgADMIN]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [pgadmin-support] Overloading functions
> that are used by operators.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 July 2003 16:38
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Donald Fraser; [ADMIN]; [pgADMIN]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [pgadmin-support] Overloading functions
> that are used by operators.
>
>
>
27;s
beside the point...
Either the above statement is illegal or you have
to find a different method for locating the function name associated with an
operator.
That's the crux of the matter.
Regards
Donald Fraser.
- Original Message -
From:
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Donald Fraser
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2003 21:00To:
[ADMIN]Cc: [pgADMIN]Subject: [pgadmin-support]
Overloading functions that are used by operators.
I have a question regarding operators
which are causing proble
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 June 2002 23:44
> To: Dave Page; Ramya Asokan; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [pgadmin-support] Cache lookup error
>
>
> I've been experien
> -Original Message-
> From: Ramya Asokan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 May 2002 21:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] Cache lookup error
>
>
> Hi,
> I created a function and a trigger - I then dropped them and
> created the same funct
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 February 2001 21:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'PostgreSQL Admin News'
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] select * from pgadmin_users; causes error
>
>
> Dave Page <
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 February 2001 15:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'PostgreSQL Admin News'; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] select * from pgadmin_users; causes error
>
>
> John Hatfie
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 February 2001 22:29
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'PostgreSQL Admin News'
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] select * from pgadmin_users; causes error
>
>
> Dave Page <
22 matches
Mail list logo
