Error: Visual C++ Runtime Installation error and installation not
continued (i forgot the exact error phrase, i'm using linux right now)
PostgreSQL: 9.0.0
OS: Windows XP SP3
Notes:
1. i believe Visual C++ 2005 and 2008 Runtime already installed before
2. im using sing administrator Account
3. m
oic, thanks ^^
--
Regards,
Kiswono P
GB
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
Just reporting that Alpha 4 was working just fine..
http://pastebin.com/ri2gXJDN
but Alpha 5 didn't:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/kyz/Repository/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/utils/error'
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-stric
ok, please ignore this thread ^^ now i know that i shouldn't using
code from cvs anyway..
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Kiswono Prayogo wrote:
> for complete build log:
> http://pastebin.com/UfVFixQY
>
> and there are no errors T^T
> i didn't understand where is
for complete build log:
http://pastebin.com/UfVFixQY
and there are no errors T^T
i didn't understand where is the possible cause of the problem..
any help, welcome ^^ thank you in advance..
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Kiswono Prayogo wrote:
> oh yeah i forgot to show you that it&
8 => /lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00284000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00135000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x004b6000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00603000)
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:33 P
Hi, i had the same problem building using latest cvs, it works fine on
64-bit ubuntu, but on 32-bit ubuntu (virtualbox) when i started the
postgres it shows:
# idir=/home/`whoami`/Software/PostgreSQL-9
# sudo su -p postgres -c "$idir/bin/postgres -D $idir/data" ;
LOG: SSL is not supported by this b
Hi, i'm really new to postgresql replication, was there any
replication tool for postgresql that can do real-time replication from
1 database to ~3-10 database (on the other machines) with little
overhead for load balancing purpose?
--
Regards,
Kiswono P
GB
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list
USE LEFT/JOIN instead of WHERE IN possibly would improve the performance..
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:51 PM, fida aljounaidi
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have an sql query which takes 20 seconds to be executed.
>
> this sql query contain more than 870 id under the select where in ()
> condition.
>
> So , it
hi, i've used postgresql for few months now, but i still don't understand
about the schema/database part and it's security consideration..
was there any better documentation (with pictures ^^) than this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/ddl-schemas.html
so, here's my current statement
10 matches
Mail list logo