Yep, O will go down that road if I am not duplicating any work. In my
experience building RPMS from SRPMS rarely just "works" :)
-Mark
On Feb 2, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mark Corner wrote:
>>
>> So are the RPMs for postgres with non-integer dat
So are the RPMs for postgres with non-integer datetimes available? :) For
centos? :)
On Feb 2, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:12 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> No idea if anyone is building
-01 at 11:02 -0500, Mark Corner wrote:
>
>> We also noticed that the are non id rpms available for 8.3, but we
>> couldn't find any for 8.4 here:
>> https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgcore
>
> You can grab spec file, patches, etc from SVN reposit
All good info...
With respect to RPMs, I was actually referring to postgres84 rpms with
non-integer datetime prebuilt.
On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mark Corner wrote:
>> We are looking to upgrade out 8.3 db to 8.4. The full dump and
>> restore is not very
We are looking to upgrade out 8.3 db to 8.4. The full dump and
restore is not very attractive due to the downtime involved.
pg_migrator is an attractive option, but we have butted up again the
integer datetime timestamp problem:
"Old and new pg_controldata date/time storage types do not match.
