[ADMIN] Error messages in server log

2002-09-25 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
The following appeared in the log this am, while running "vacuumdb": [13323] DEBUG: ReceiveSharedInvalidMessages: cache state reset [25461] DEBUG: SendSharedInvalidMessage: SI buffer overflow [13322] DEBUG: ReceiveSharedInvalidMessages: cache state reset [13323] DEBUG: ReceiveSharedInvali

Re: [ADMIN] Signal 11

2002-10-31 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
FYI, our "signal 11" problem was caused by faulty cache memory on the RAID controller. -Original Message- From: Eric L. Blevins [mailto:eblevins@;insight.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Signal 11 From: "Andrew Sullivan" <[EMAIL PR

Re: [ADMIN] loading and unloading rows

2002-11-05 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
As long as you are going to use pipes to do your "load/unload" or "read from one cluster, copy to another", why not go with: /usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql -U -d -h \ -P format=unaligned -P fieldsep='\t' -P tuples_only \ -c "select * from tab where yoo='hoo'" | /usr/local

[ADMIN] Bug in psql's "-R" option?

2002-11-05 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
There seems to be a bug in psql's -R option (and the -P recordsep= ) version. I find that whereas the following succeeds: /usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql -U -d -h \ -P format=unaligned -P fieldsep='\t' -P tuples_only \ -c "select * from tab where yoo='hoo'" | /usr/local/pg

Re: [ADMIN] Bug in psql's "-R" option?

2002-11-05 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 14:21 To: Murthy Kambhampaty Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Bug in psql's "-R" option? psql -R controls the record separator for query output, not COPY. ------

[ADMIN] PostgreSQL and file system level backup

2002-11-15 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
The postgresql documentation states that in order to get a usable backup from a filesystem dump (or copy) the database server must be shut down. Moreover, "Half-way measures such as disallowing all connections will not work as there is always some buffering going on. For this reason it is also not

Re: [ADMIN] Database backup and restore

2002-11-22 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
In bash, I use: == script fragment == ~!/bin/bash $BackupDir= $LogFile= for db_name in $(/usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql -U postgres -d template1 -n -t -c "select datname from pg_database where datistemplate='f';"); do /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -U postgres -Fc

Re: [ADMIN] how to cancel a query ?

2002-12-13 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
I was asking on the pyPgSQL list whether the PQrequestCancel() would allow that if a user submitting queries from Python closed the Python shell, the query would be cancelled (a la ^C in psql). This led me to: If the connection from which a synchronous query ("libpq->connection.query()") was subm

[ADMIN] [SOLVED] RE: PostgreSQL 7.3 installation on RedHat 8.0 fails

2002-12-13 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Sorry for the chatter. I used "gmake" instead of "make" and passed all 89 tests. That's a new one on me. With apologies, Murthy -Original Message- From: Murthy Kambhampaty Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 15:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PRO

[ADMIN] PostgreSQL 7.3 installation on RedHat 8.0 fails

2002-12-13 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
On RedHat 8.0 (upgraded from Red Hat 7.2 with PostgreSQL 7.2.3), "make check" gives the following error: "/home/postgres/postgresql-7.3/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/install//usr/loc al/pgsql/bin/pg_encoding: relocation error: /home/postgres/postgresql-7.3/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/install//usr/

FW: [ADMIN] RE: PostgreSQL 7.3 installation on RedHat 8.0 fails [Follow up]

2002-12-13 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
tmenow with template=template1 encoding='SQL_ASCII'" from psql goes fine. Murthy -Original Message- From: Murthy Kambhampaty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 15:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [AD

Re: [ADMIN] ReceiveSharedInvalidMessages: cache state reset

2003-01-21 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Based on traffic on the Admin list, it is my understanding that this is a "status" message, not an "error" message. -Original Message- From: Antoine LOBATO A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 05:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ReceiveSharedInvalidMessages: cache

[ADMIN] Dump/restoring a given table in a given schema

2003-02-26 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Is there a way to do pg_dump -h host1 -d db1 -t tbl1 -Fc | pg_restore -d db1 -h host2 selectively, when there are multiple tables named tbl1 in db1 on host1? The following scenario clarifies the question: I have two tables named exmpl_tbl, one in the schema "public" and the other in the schema

Re: [ADMIN] LVM snapshots

2003-03-14 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Here's the script I use to mount a snapshot and rsync to a remote server; postgresql is started and stopped on the remote server as part of the backup procedure to make sure that the backup log contains any errors that might show up. The restore strategy is to start the postmaster on the remote ser

Follow-up RE: [ADMIN] LVM snapshots

2003-03-14 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
I should have noted that unless $PGDATA/xlog is on the same LVM logical volume as $PGDATA, the backups produced by the script I sent will be useless. -Original Message- From: Murthy Kambhampaty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:59 To: 'Matt Clark'; [EMAIL

[ADMIN] More along the lines of "WEIRD CRASH?!?!"?

2003-03-18 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
While putting a test server (dual PIII 1GHz, 512M ram, ide single disk for system and $PGDATA) under high load, I keep running into: Mar 18 12:33:19 c257lx postgres[25277]: [6] NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'test_pkey' for table 'test' Mar 18 12:33:22 c257lx po

Re: [ADMIN] Syncing DBs prior to RServ replication

2003-06-11 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
I think you'd benefit from a two-stage Rsync (this was discussed on this list in the past few months): 1. Rsync the $PGDATA cluster from the "hot" server to the "standby" server, with the postmaster running 2. Stop the postmaster and perform the same rsync again (this will take only a few seconds

Re: [ADMIN] Backup procedure

2003-08-14 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
I think its fair to say that the documentation is outdated on this subject, becuase it had in mind a different definition of "consistent snapshots". See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postgresql-admin&w=2&r=1&s=LVM+snapshots&q=b where Tom Lane and Peter Eisentraut agree that if your hardware or s

Re: [ADMIN] Backup routine

2003-08-14 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
On Monday, August 11, 2003 17:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 17:26 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Backup routine > > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [ADMIN] Backup routine

2003-08-14 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
There's an extensive discussion of doing file system level backups off an LVM snapshot taken on a frozen XFS filesystem (XFS provides xfs_freeze command which allows the sysadmin to freeze and unfreeze a given file system at will). See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postgresql-admin&w=2&r=1&s=LVM+

[ADMIN] Logging VACUUM activity in version 7.3

2003-08-28 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Does version 7.3 provide a way to get VACUUM activity reports in the server log (postmaster's stderr) without having them show up in the client's stderr? In 7.2, running vacuum "quiet", i.e., /usr/local/pgsql/bin/vacuumdb -U postgres -q -a -z logged vacuum activity to the server log. e.g., "DEBU

Re: [ADMIN] Seeking information about backup/recovery

2003-09-04 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
IMHO, while point-in-time recovery would be great to have, there are many applications that benefit from having online backup and recovery without needing log roll-forward. For example, Oracle contrasts "Full Database Point-in-time Recovery", the feature mentioned by Bruce, with "Tablespace Point i

Re: [ADMIN] Seeking information about backup/recovery

2003-09-04 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
On Thursday, September 04, 2003 18:12, Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Murthy Kambhampaty wrote: ... >I assume you are contrasting _any_ point-in-time recovery to recover up >to the crash point, right? > Right. >Anyway, unfortunately, WAL doesn't contain enough info

Re: [ADMIN] [PERFORM] backup/restore - another area.

2003-10-17 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
There's been a lot of discussion on the ADMIN list about postgresql backups from LVM snapshots: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postgresql-admin&w=2&r=1&s=LVM+snapshot&q=b Note that the existence of the snapshot slows the original filesystem down, so you want to minimize the duration for which the

Re: [ADMIN] [PERFORM] backup/restore - another area.

2003-10-17 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Friday, October 17, 2003 12:05, Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Murthy Kambhampaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ... The script handles situations >> where (i) the XFS filesystem containing $PGDATA has an >external log and (ii) >> the postmaster log ($P

Re: [ADMIN] sql scripts

2003-10-20 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
If it's a bash script you could use: # SomeTable= TableTest=$(psql -d -U -ntc "select relname from pg_class where relname='$SomeTable'") [[ -n "$TableTest" ]] && psql -d -U -nc "drop table $SomeTable" # It's not quite "in postgres's sql", but it could get the job done >-Origina

[ADMIN] 7.4RC2: pg_crypto not working?

2003-11-12 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
After having initdb'd and started the server (gmake check said it passed all 93 tests), and doing a make; make install in pgcrypto, I tried creating the pgcrytpo functions with # psql -d template1 -f pgcrypto.sql This produced a series of errors as follows: 2003-11-12 16:56:14.287480500 [9781] L

[SOLVED] RE: [ADMIN] 7.4RC2: pg_crypto not working?

2003-11-13 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Thanks Tom and Reece for replying. It turns out that the cryptolib/cryptsrc/random source combination I specified -- openssl/system/openssl -- was the problem; changing the combination to openssl/builtin/openssl, "solved" the problem. ~/contrib/pgcrypto/Makefile snippet: # either 'builtin', 'mhash

Re: [linux-lvm] RE: [ADMIN] [PERFORM] backup/restore - another

2003-12-02 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] RE: [ADMIN] [PERFORM] backup/restore > - another > > > Does xfs_freeze work on red hat 7.3? > > Cynthia Leon > > -----Original Message- &

Re: [Retrieved]RE: [ADMIN] backup and recovery

2004-03-26 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
I think you can get both benefits of "multi-statement transactions for INSERT dumps" by doing "subset copies" ... without any changes in postgresql! The method I use is developed for handling single table "loads", but is still relatively painless even for database dumps; however, it is limited

Re: [Retrieved]RE: [ADMIN] backup and recovery

2004-03-26 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
db_quux -f - -Atnq >> "$LogFile" 2>&1) Cheers,    Murthy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Murthy Kambhampaty Sent: Fri 3/26/2004 3:30 PM To: Naomi Walker; Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian; Tsirkin Evgeny; Mark M. Huber; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems

2004-04-07 Thread Murthy Kambhampaty
On Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:26 AM Tom Lane wrote: > > But to get back to the point of this discussion: to allow PG > to use raw devices instead of filesystems, we'd first have to do a ton of > portability work ... [The following is said in a low, tentative voice :) ] I wonder if writing th

[ADMIN] PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

2005-04-06 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
Can integer datetimes support be added to the PGDG distributed RPMS for Fedora at the next version requiring an initdb. I've attached a diff to the specfile for 8.0.1. Thanks, Murthy --- /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postgresql-8.0.1-2PGDG.spec 2005-02-22 18:04:50.0 -0500 +++ /usr/src/redhat/SPE

Re: [ADMIN] PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

2005-05-14 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
--- Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you please tell us why integer datetimes > should be enabled in our > RPMs by default? > > We are not sure that many people need it, also it's > easy for someone to > add this support using the SRPMs provided. > "Consistent precision through

[ADMIN] Config option log_statement

2005-05-14 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
In postgresql 8.0, "create table <> as ..." statements appear not to logged unless log_statement = 'all' in postgresql.conf. We are trying to reduce noise in the logs from pgAdminIII and phpPgAdmin, but we use a lot of 'create table <> as ...' queries that need to be logged, and their duration tra

Re: [ADMIN] PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

2005-05-14 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because almost nobody has complained about the lack > of it. > (I'm talking about actual field experience of there > being a > problem, not somebody objecting that it sounds like > a > feature worth having.) > > It should also be pointed out that we are s