Re: [JDBC] [ADMIN] Missing documentation for error code: 80S01

2011-04-13 Thread Oliver Jowett
On 13 April 2011 21:57, Donald Fraser wrote: > Technically yes. When performing a read on the socket you get -1 indicating > EOF or remote socket closed. You don't get an IO error. > The difficult part is what was the client doing when the server closes the > socket? > If the client wasn't doing

Re: [ADMIN] [JDBC] number of transactions doubling

2006-09-28 Thread Oliver Jowett
Sriram Dandapani wrote: Autocommit is set to off once a connection is obtained from the jboss pool. It is turned back on when it is closed (so that any idle transactions are committed). Don't know what to suggest then -- if autocommit is off then the JDBC driver should be sending BEGIN before

Re: [ADMIN] [JDBC] number of transactions doubling

2006-09-28 Thread Oliver Jowett
Sriram Dandapani wrote: The target table has triggers that route data to appropriate tables. The tables to which data is routed has check constraints that do further inserts. (All of this happens in 1 jdbc transaction) I expect JDBC Batching to generate fewer transactions depending on batch

Re: [JDBC] [ADMIN] ERROR: canceling query due to user request

2005-09-13 Thread Oliver Jowett
Tom Lane wrote: > This has been discussed before (try the pgsql-jdbc list archives). > I believe we concluded that an appropriate fix was to not consider the > cancel request "done" until the client sees the separate connection > dropped by the postmaster. libpq's cancel functions wait for that t