Re: [ADMIN] Memory/Performance issue: server closed the connection

2005-10-12 Thread Pieter-Jan Savat
Tom Lane wrote: Pieter-Jan Savat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 2005-10-11 17:22:28 CEST ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [2005-10-11 17:08:49 CEST] PANIC: right sibling's left-link doesn't match You've got a corrupt btree index. Try reindexing that table.

Re: [ADMIN] Memory/Performance issue: server closed the connection

2005-10-11 Thread Pieter-Jan Savat
Tom Lane wrote: That shouldn't happen. What shows up in the postmaster log? Here is the output of the log: 2005-10-11 17:22:00 CEST (@) [] DEBUG: checkpoint complete; 0 transaction log file(s) added, 0 removed, 3 recycled 2005-10-11 17:22:26 CEST (@) [] LOG: checkpoints are occurring to

[ADMIN] Memory/Performance issue: server closed the connection unexpectedly

2005-10-11 Thread Pieter-Jan Savat
Hi, I'm performing some tests on performance: when to use or not use foreign keys. I have a table A with 50 columns, 8 of them have a foreign key to some other table, and there is a table B with 65 columns, only 5 of them have a foreign key to some table (so foreign data is copied locally). Th

[ADMIN] Vacuum full takes forever

2005-06-15 Thread Pieter-Jan Savat
Hello, I'm facing the following problem. I have a postgres 8.0 DB with a table 'results' containing 6.000.000 records. This table has 16 indexes. Each one basically created to speed up different queries. Because of some glitch in the system there has never been a VACUUM FULL on this table.