Yo Scott, Greg & William!
I tried to send the following message last week, but my posting never
got here. Guess my provider has fucked up. So here goes again, sorry
for late reply.
For knowledgeable feedback I have asked, and that's what I have got.
Thanx a lot. My thanks also Jim Wilson who ad
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
Controller / Hard Discs:
RAID 5 with 4+ discs including a hot spare. But SCSI or SATA?
I am undecided on this. Until about a year ago, I would have said SCSI,
period. But I have read of SATA RAIDs for entry-level-servers doing
q
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
CPU:
Single AMD Opteron.
Opteron, because i plan to migrate to amd64 debian as soon as Debian
has a stable release.
Single, because multi-CPU would only make sense if the CPU could ever
get the bottleneck. But I don't have to fear that, right? No need for a
dual-cpu set
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> Hi List!
Howdy!
> Short version:
> It is for a medium sized database. ~ 50 users, < 5GB, biggest table < 1
> million tupples, 60 tables, lots of indices, triggers, rules, and other
> objects.
SNIP!
> What will I purchase?
>
> CPU:
> Single AM
Hi List!
I have to purchase new hardware for my company's new dedicated PG
database server. As it is my first time shopping for this special
purpose, I would feel less nervous if I could get some knowledgeable
feedback on this matter.
What is it for?
Short version:
It is for a medium sized d
