Gilberto Castillo Mart?nez wrote:
>
>
> El jue, 10-03-2011 a las 15:33 -0500, Bruce Momjian escribi?:
> > Dyonisius Visser wrote:
> > > On 10 March 2011 21:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, let's skip documenting this then. ?They can already do this via
> > > > pg_hba.conf.
> > >
> >
> > > > Restricting access via pg_hba.conf is something else than listening
> > > > (or not) on sockets...
> > > >
> > > > FYI, the listen_addresses is basically the same as sshd's ListenAddress.
> > >
> > > Yes, listen_addresses prevents anyone from even binding to the address.
> >
> > I keep
Gilberto Castillo Mart?nez wrote:
>
>
> El jue, 10-03-2011 a las 15:33 -0500, Bruce Momjian escribi?:
> > Dyonisius Visser wrote:
> > > On 10 March 2011 21:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, let's skip documenting this then. ?They can already do this via
> > > > pg_hba.conf.
> > >
> >
El jue, 10-03-2011 a las 15:33 -0500, Bruce Momjian escribió:
> Dyonisius Visser wrote:
> > On 10 March 2011 21:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > OK, let's skip documenting this then. ?They can already do this via
> > > pg_hba.conf.
> >
> > Restricting access via pg_hba.conf is something else
On 10 March 2011 21:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, let's skip documenting this then. They can already do this via
> pg_hba.conf.
Restricting access via pg_hba.conf is something else than listening
(or not) on sockets...
FYI, the listen_addresses is basically the same as sshd's ListenAddress.
Dyonisius Visser wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 21:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > OK, let's skip documenting this then. ?They can already do this via
> > pg_hba.conf.
>
> Restricting access via pg_hba.conf is something else than listening
> (or not) on sockets...
>
> FYI, the listen_addresses is bas
On 10 March 2011 19:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Interesting. How would someone listen only on IPv4 addresses?
listen_addresses = '0.0.0.0'
root@toad:/etc/postgresql/8.4/main# telnet ::1 5432
Trying ::1...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
root@toad:/etc/postgresql/8.
El jue, 10-03-2011 a las 21:11 +0100, Dyonisius Visser escribió:
> On 10 March 2011 19:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Interesting. How would someone listen only on IPv4 addresses?
>
> listen_addresses = '0.0.0.0'
>
> root@toad:/etc/postgresql/8.4/main# telnet ::1 5432
> Trying ::1...
> telne
> OK, let's skip documenting this then. They can already do this via
> pg_hba.conf.
What would the postgresal.conf listen_addresses?
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.Cuba.
---
This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail Gatew
Gilberto Castillo Mart?nez wrote:
>
>
> > My big question is whether '::' is supported on all platforms that
> > support IPv6, and whether there is an IPv4-only syntax.
>
> Umm, you have to try, at least there is not much documented about it.
OK, let's skip documenting this then. They can alre
> My big question is whether '::' is supported on all platforms that
> support IPv6, and whether there is an IPv4-only syntax.
Umm, you have to try, at least there is not much documented about it.
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.
Gilberto Castillo Mart?nez wrote:
>
>
> > > Maybe!!.
> >
> > Interesting. How would someone listen only on IPv4 addresses?
>
> In documentation there are few examples of its use, there are several
> networks that only use IPv6
My big question is whether '::' is supported on all platforms that
> > Maybe!!.
>
> Interesting. How would someone listen only on IPv4 addresses?
In documentation there are few examples of its use, there are several
networks that only use IPv6
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.Cuba.
---
This m
Gilberto Castillo Mart?nez wrote:
>
>
> El mi?, 09-03-2011 a las 13:58 +0100, Dyonisius Visser escribi?:
> > hi guys
> >
> > I am in the process of converting my network to IPv6 only (well, as
> > much as possible).
> > Since our own network has fully functional IPv6 connectivity, I should
> > b
El mié, 09-03-2011 a las 13:58 +0100, Dyonisius Visser escribió:
> hi guys
>
> I am in the process of converting my network to IPv6 only (well, as
> much as possible).
> Since our own network has fully functional IPv6 connectivity, I should
> be able to move all services that are used internally
hi guys
I am in the process of converting my network to IPv6 only (well, as
much as possible).
Since our own network has fully functional IPv6 connectivity, I should
be able to move all services that are used internally only, to IPv6
only.
Postgres is one of those services.
I could not find anywh
16 matches
Mail list logo