Hi,
I received the mail below, responding to some remarks I made here. I
think it's good news.
A
- Forwarded message from "Timothy D. Witham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Some clarifications on what Mark said
From: "T
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:35:05PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:30:25 -0700, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > I'm afraid that the OSDL benchmark has a (IMNSHO stupid) handicap in
> > getting it working and making it a well-respected benchmark:
>
> There is no handicap, it just need
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:30:25 -0700, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:53:05AM -0700, Derek Neighbors wrote:
>> Someone needs to check out
>> http://www.osdl.org/projects/performance/osdldbt.html the OSDL
>> benchmarking tool for DBs and get Postgres to work with it and then
>>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:53:05AM -0700, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> Someone needs to check out
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/performance/osdldbt.html the OSDL
> benchmarking tool for DBs and get Postgres to work with it and then run
> it and publish results or at a mininum use it to help tune per
Someone needs to check out
http://www.osdl.org/projects/performance/osdldbt.html the OSDL
benchmarking tool for DBs and get Postgres to work with it and then run
it and publish results or at a mininum use it to help tune performance for
Postgres.
-Derek
Elielson Fontanezi said:
> Hi everyone!
>
Hi
everyone!
I have searched the net looking for other postgreSQL
benchmark
than the one
offered by OSDB, and couldn'd find anything.
Is there other on the net?
.. A Question... Since before your sun burned hot in space and before your rac
