Re: [ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warning

2010-04-08 Thread Jonathan Foy
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > > If you're on 8.1 it's important to be on the latest 8.1 -- there are > at least 17 significant bugs that warranted bug-fix releases between > 8.1.3 and 8.1.20 including security bugs and data corruption bugs. > Understood. It's my current t

Re: [ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warning

2010-04-08 Thread Greg Stark
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Jonathan Foy wrote: > Thanks for the reply... > > We have an unhealthy habit of not updating very often around here, one that > I'm trying to fix. We run both 8.1 and 8.4, and we're testing the update to > 8.1.20 this weekendfrom 8.1.3.  Across the board 8.4 upd

Re: [ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warning

2010-04-08 Thread Jonathan Foy
Thanks for the reply... We have an unhealthy habit of not updating very often around here, one that I'm trying to fix. We run both 8.1 and 8.4, and we're testing the update to 8.1.20 this weekendfrom 8.1.3. Across the board 8.4 update will take much more testing due to the typing issue. Other

Re: [ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warning

2010-04-07 Thread Greg Stark
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Jonathan Foy wrote: > Hello > > I came in this morning and noticed this warning sitting in my inbox quite a > few times... > > WARNING:  PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "table_2010q1" > page 471118 > WARNING:  PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly

[ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warning

2010-04-01 Thread Jonathan Foy
Hello I came in this morning and noticed this warning sitting in my inbox quite a few times... WARNING: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "table_2010q1" page 471118 WARNING: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "table_2010q1" page 471119 WARNING: PD_ALL_VISIBLE