Scott Marlowe wrote:
Oracle's answer to my queries to have a new version made? "Why don't
you make it?"
While I'm sure someone will step in to help out if this gets botched on
Oracle's side, I know if I were running any production Solaris installs
that counted on packaged builds of Postgr
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Lou Picciano wrote:
> I'd be happy to offer Solaris build services, as well, should this become an
> issue - for as long as we can maintain our loyalty to Solaris. We are
> dependent now on the same set of variables to which Tom alludes. I think
> the inference mu
- and loads of other immensely useful packages - on
SunFreeware, even in the face of tenuous support from Sun. Thank You, Steve!
Lou
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane"
To: "wstrzalka"
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2010 9:51:27 AM
wstrzalka writes:
>As I know Solaris packages were maintained by Sun but I'm not sure
> about the future after recent buildfarm problems.
>Does the community plans to maintain Solaris packages or it will be
> Oracle dependent?
When and if Bjorn stops building packages, we'll look for a re
As I know Solaris packages were maintained by Sun but I'm not sure
about the future after recent buildfarm problems.
Does the community plans to maintain Solaris packages or it will be
Oracle dependent?
Are there any alternative packages for Solaris I'm not aware of
(except building from
