Hi,
Il 09/02/11 17:53, CS DBA ha scritto:
One of the main considerations per Hot Standby vs SLONY is replication
scope. With Hot Standby you get everything that occurs in the cluster,
across all databases.
Yep, I agree with you Kevin regarding the replication scope. I assumed
that Jai was loo
One of the main considerations per Hot Standby vs SLONY is replication
scope. With Hot Standby you get everything that occurs in the cluster,
across all databases. With SLONY you are limited to at most a single
database per "SLONY Cluster", and you can define replication sets which
only contain
Hi,
Il 09/02/11 01:34, Rangi, Jai ha scritto:
Hello,
I am looking for a replication solution for PG 9.x. Idea is to have
one master replication server and multiple (around 20) slave servers
read only. I see PG 9 has inbuilt Streaming replication. Is this the
best replication solution. How a
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Rangi, Jai wrote:
> I am looking for a replication solution for PG 9.x. Idea is to have one
> master replication server and multiple (around 20) slave servers read only.
I know (anecdotally) of at least one organization that's using Bucardo
[1] to synchronize many
Hello,
I am looking for a replication solution for PG 9.x. Idea is to have one
master replication server and multiple (around 20) slave servers read
only. I see PG 9 has inbuilt Streaming replication. Is this the best
replication solution. How about slony? Which option will keep the slave
nodes in
