Bryan Keller wrote:
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS
via NFS. I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not
recommended, as it will be slow and could potentially cause data
corruption.
My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so in
Bryan Keller wrote:
It sounds like NFS is a viable solution nowadays. I a still going to shoot for
using iSCSI, given it is a block-level protocol rather than file-level, it
seems to me it would be better suited to database I/O.
Please digest carefully where Joe Conway pointed out that it
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:56 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
Bryan Keller wrote:
It sounds like NFS is a viable solution nowadays. I a still going to shoot
for using iSCSI, given it is a block-level protocol rather than file-level,
it seems to me it would be better suited to database I/O.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Bryan Keller brya...@gmail.com wrote:
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via
NFS. I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as
it will be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
Its not
Thanks for the feedback. It sounds like NFS is a viable solution nowadays. I a
still going to shoot for using iSCSI, given it is a block-level protocol rather
than file-level, it seems to me it would be better suited to database I/O.
On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:07 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Thu,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Bryan Keller brya...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. It sounds like NFS is a viable solution nowadays. I
a still going to shoot for using iSCSI, given it is a block-level protocol
rather than file-level, it seems to me it would be better suited to
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via NFS.
I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as it will
be slow and cause data corruption.
My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so in case of server
failure, I can start up a
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via NFS.
I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as it will
be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so in case of server
On 2/11/11 9:09 AM, Frederiko Costa wrote:
Paying close attention to details to avoid any corruption issue in a
shared environment, I don't think it would be a problem going for NFS.
FYI -- beware of NFS related kernel bugs in recent Red Hat 5.x kernels:
On 02/09/2011 03:49 PM, Jim Mlodgenski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Kellerbrya...@gmail.com wrote:
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via NFS.
I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as it will
be slow and could
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via NFS.
I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as it will
be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so in case of server
: [ADMIN] Postgres on NAS/NFS
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via
NFS. I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as
it will be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Keller brya...@gmail.com wrote:
I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via
NFS. I have read a few things on the Web saying this is not recommended, as
it will be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
My goal is
13 matches
Mail list logo
