On 2/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SuSE always only do backports of fixes and never increase the version
> number. They only appended a self made "build" number which increases.
> So it is really possible that all the fixes are in while the version
> stays the same.
Not tr
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:39, Tomeh, Husam wrote:
> I do understand your school of thinking. But let me say this, from just
> a user point of view who had used 7.4.x, 8.0, and 8.1, I'd highly
> recommend to start off with 8.1. I can comment on performance in
> particular among other great stuff suc
before we begin to use, observe, and experience Postgres of our own?
Thanks, Bob
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Given, Robert A
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Postgresql performance and tuning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Zitat von Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> But you're not running the least buggy version of the 7.4 branch. The
>> 7.4 branch is up to 7.4.9. If you are runing 7.4.2 then you haven't
>> installed all the updates supplied by Suse for their distribution (or
>> Suse
Zitat von Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But you're not running the least buggy version of the 7.4 branch. The
7.4 branch is up to 7.4.9. If you are runing 7.4.2 then you haven't
installed all the updates supplied by Suse for their distribution (or
Suse backports bug fixes from 7.4.9 to 7.4
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:16 AM
> To: Given, Robert A
> Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Postgresql performance and tuning questions
>
> "Given, Robert A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We are beginning a
"Given, Robert A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Our philosophy is to use products that have been established, tested and
> stable. We tend to not go with newer versions until they have time to
> mature and have the bugs worked out. This is the version of the DB that
> was packaged with the version
, and experience Postgres of our own?
Thanks, Bob
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Given, Robert A
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Postgresql performance and tuning questions
"Given, Robert
"Given, Robert A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are beginning a project to use Postgresql 7.4.2 on zLinux SLES9
> The application of interest is uPortal 2.4.3.
Why are you not starting with a reasonably up-to-date version of
Postgres?
regards, tom lane
Title: Postgresql performance and tuning questions
Greetings,
We are beginning a project to use Postgresql 7.4.2 on zLinux SLES9
The application of interest is uPortal 2.4.3.
I'm interested in learning about any changes you've made to your Postgresql DB to prepare it for uPortal? What s
10 matches
Mail list logo
