Re: [ADMIN] VACUUM warning message.

2003-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm i do the below daily to this table. And this is pgsql 7.3 > TRUNCATE TABLE public.site_search; Drat. Now that I look at it, 7.3 TRUNCATE doesn't send any kind of relcache inval message, so it's got the same kind of problem that the nailed-in-cache catalogs do: ot

Re: [ADMIN] VACUUM warning message.

2003-01-27 Thread mallah
Hmm i do the below daily to this table. And this is pgsql 7.3 ~~~ BEGIN WORK; INSERT INTO archives.site_search SELECT * from public.site_search; COMMIT; TRUNCATE TABLE public.site_search; ~~ and then it is VACUMMED within 24 hrs. The table public.site_sea

Re: [ADMIN] VACUUM warning message.

2003-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I assume this is 7.2.X. I know this is fixed in 7.3.1 but I am not sure > what release we fixed it in. The HISTORY file doesn't have a specific > mention of the fix. It is not something to be worried about, as I > remember. Mmm, I'm not sure. The kno

Re: [ADMIN] VACUUM warning message.

2003-01-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
I assume this is 7.2.X. I know this is fixed in 7.3.1 but I am not sure what release we fixed it in. The HISTORY file doesn't have a specific mention of the fix. It is not something to be worried about, as I remember. ---

[ADMIN] VACUUM warning message.

2003-01-24 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah.
I get the following messages while vacuuming is there anything alarming? regds mallah. On Saturday 25 January 2003 07:11 am, you wrote: > SET autocommit TO 'on';VACUUM ANALYZE > WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 1 - fixing > WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 2 - fixing