Hi everyone on the list. I want to know what is the reccommended OS to work with PostgreSQL , on specific with PostGIS:
One more question is about what HW (server) offers the best performance for a Web Map Server bases on PostGIS and mapserver.
Thanks in advance.
raul n. retamozo velarde
[EM
On Sep 22, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Raul Retamozo wrote:
Hi everyone on the list. I want to know what is the reccommended OS
to work with PostgreSQL , on specific with PostGIS:
One more question is about what HW (server) offers the best
performance for a Web Map Server bases on PostGIS and mapserver.
Hi.
On 9/25/06, Jim Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for hardware, until recently, AMD was the un-disputed king when it
came to running PostgreSQL (and databases in general). But the newer
Intel CPUs seem to have surpassed the Opteron. I believe there's a
tweakers.net article floating around
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Raul Retamozo wrote:
> > Hi everyone on the list. I want to know what is the reccommended OS
> > to work with PostgreSQL , on specific with PostGIS:
> > One more question is about what HW (server) offers the best
I'm curious about the "[ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4" thread
as it applies to this thread.The COPY thread pointed to kernel
issues in x86_64 GNU/Linux SLES 9. I'm wondering if x86_64 is not
a good move for pg servers at this time. Are there happy x86_64
production deployments?
On Mon,
amozo; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] best OS and HW for postgreSQL
>
>
>
> I'm curious about the "[ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4" thread
> as it applies to this thread.The COPY thread pointed to kernel
> issues in x86_64 GNU/Linux SLE
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Raul Retamozo wrote:
Hi everyone on the list. I want to know what is the reccommended OS
to work with PostgreSQL , on specific with PostGIS:
One more question is about what HW (server) offers
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 10:28, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
> >> On Sep 22, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Raul Retamozo wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone on the list. I want to know what is the reccommended OS
> >>> to work with PostgreSQL , on sp
Much more important is your disk subsystem. Using an Areca RAID
controller with battery backed cache and a half dozen or more hard
drives is often the real winner for performance.
Yes, LSI and 3Ware are also good. I am particularly fond of LSI but
Areca has PCI-Express cards which means you ca
Ray Stell wrote:
I'm curious about the "[ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4" thread
as it applies to this thread.The COPY thread pointed to kernel
issues in x86_64 GNU/Linux SLES 9. I'm wondering if x86_64 is not
a good move for pg servers at this time. Are there happy x86_64
production deplo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> On Sep 22, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Raul Retamozo wrote:
Hi everyone on the list. I want to know what is the reccommended
OS to work with PostgreSQL , on specific wit
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:43 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Hi.
On 9/25/06, Jim Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for hardware, until recently, AMD was the un-disputed king when it
came to running PostgreSQL (and databases in general). But the newer
Intel CPUs seem to have surpassed the Opteron. I b
12 matches
Mail list logo
