Re: [ADMIN] dbsize & pg_dump

2006-04-26 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:47:53PM -0500, Jason Minion wrote: > Usually a dump is significantly smaller than a live database due to > space taken up by indexes and discarded tuples from MVCC. If it's > significantly smaller you may also want to take a look at your vacuuming > procedure. Between ex

Re: [ADMIN] dbsize & pg_dump

2006-04-25 Thread Jason Minion
PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mcelroy, tim Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:06 PM To: 'pgsql-admin@postgresql.org' Subject: Re: [ADMIN] dbsize & pg_dump Please disregard this question. I'm using pg_dump -F

Re: [ADMIN] dbsize & pg_dump

2006-04-25 Thread mcelroy, tim
x27;pgsql-admin@postgresql.org' Subject: [ADMIN] dbsize & pg_dump   Good afternoon, Probably an easy question but why are the file sizes differ so much between these two tools? For example:  A backup using pg_dump of our largest DB creates a file 384MB in size Using the following

[ADMIN] dbsize & pg_dump

2006-04-25 Thread mcelroy, tim
Title: dbsize & pg_dump Good afternoon, Probably an easy question but why are the file sizes differ so much between these two tools? For example:  A backup using pg_dump of our largest DB creates a file 384MB in size Using the following SQL code utilizing dbsize I get the following: FIX