This is occurring In an 8.4.2 pg database, and I have noticed it in 8.3.10 as
well.
We do a lot of work with temp tables here, and over time a lot of pg_temp_[n]
schemas have appeared.
Similarly, we notice build-up of pg_toast_[n] schemas.
Is it ok to drop these if they contain no tables?
Or is
Mark Rostron mrost...@ql2.com writes:
We do a lot of work with temp tables here, and over time a lot of pg_temp_[n]
schemas have appeared.
Similarly, we notice build-up of pg_toast_[n] schemas.
This is expected. There'll be one for each backend slot that's ever
used any temp tables.
Is it
