> ==
> Cheers for your response. I agree, pg_dump/pg_dumpall works fine.
> It seems I was looking at this problem from the wrong direction.
>
> I now believe this to be a view storage issue and was hoping you could
> complete
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 1999 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_dump query about views.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Again, apolog
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 1999 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_dump query about views.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Again, apolog
>
>
> Again, apologies if this is a duplication from the past but I can't it in
> pgsql-questions :
>
> ---
>
> In the reference section, it states there are problems with dumping views
> and rules.
> A pg_dumpall/pg_dump stores the view as a table with a rule.
> Theref
Again, apologies if this is a duplication from the past but I can't it in
pgsql-questions :
---
In the reference section, it states there are problems with dumping views
and rules.
A pg_dumpall/pg_dump stores the view as a table with a rule.
Therefore, when loaded ba
